Development of a clinical risk score to risk stratify for a serious cause of vertigo: A prospective cohort study
Ohle, R.
Show abstract
ObjectivesIdentify high-risk clinical characteristics for a serious cause of vertigo in patients presenting to the emergency department. DesignMulticentre prospective cohort study over 3 years. SettingThree university-affiliated tertiary care emergency departments. ParticipantsPatients presenting with vertigo, dizziness or imbalance. A total of 2078 of 2618 potentially eligible patients (79.4%) were enrolled (mean age 77.1 years; 59% women). Main outcome measurementsAn adjudicated serious diagnosis defined as stroke, transient ischemic attack, vertebral artery dissection or brain tumour. ResultsSerious events occurred in 111 (5.3%) patients. We used logistic regression to create a 7-item prediction model: male, age over 65, hypertension, diabetes, motor/sensory deficits, cerebellar signs/symptoms and benign paroxysmal positional vertigo diagnosis (C-statistic 0.96, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.92-0.98). The risk of a serious diagnosis ranged from 0% for a score of <5, 2.1% for a score of 5-8, and 41% for a score >8. Sensitivity for a serious diagnosis was 100% (95% CI, 97.1-100%) and specificity 72.1% (95% CI, 70.1-74%) for a score <5. ConclusionsThe Sudbury Vertigo Risk Score identifies the risk of a serious diagnosis as a cause of a patients vertigo and can assist physicians in guiding further investigation, consultation and treatment decisions, improving resource utilization and reducing missed diagnoses.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Intracerebral Hemorrhage Outcomes after Reversal of Subtherapeutic Warfarin: Analysis of Data from GWTG-Stroke 95%
- Prospective Observational Cohort Study Of Tenecteplase Versus Alteplase In Routine Clinical Practice 95%
- Normobaric Hyperoxia Combined with Endovascular Treatment Based on Temporal Gradient: A dose-escalation study 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Diagnostic accuracy of the STANDING algorithm in patients with isolated vertigo/dizziness, a multicentre prospective study (STANDING-M) 97%
- The association between major trauma centre care and outcomes of adult patients injured by low falls in England and Wales 91%
- Accuracy of the National Early Warning Score version 2 (NEWS2) in predicting need for time-critical treatment: Retrospective observational cohort study 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Factors Associated with Delayed Hospital Arrival after Stroke Onset: An Observational Study in Thanh Hoa Province, Vietnam 94%
- Single-Center Hospital and Outpatient Opioid Use for Lower Extremity Arterial Disease 92%
- Comparison of in-hospital mortality and clinical outcomes among patients greater than and less than 80 years undergoing TAVR 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Leveraging Machine Learning for Enhanced and Interpretable Risk Prediction of Venous Thromboembolism in Acute Ischemic Stroke Care 94%
- Non-invasive Auricular Vagus nerve stimulation for Subarachnoid Hemorrhage (NAVSaH): Protocol for a prospective, triple-blinded, randomized controlled trial 93%
- Intravenous Thrombolysis for Acute Central Retinal Artery Occlusion: Protocol For a Systematic Review and Individual Participant Data Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Modified Rankin Scale Disability Status at Day 4 Poststroke is an Informative Predictor of Long-Term Day 90 Outcome 96%
- Usage of Mineralocorticoids and Isotonic Crystalloids in Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Patients in the United States 95%
- Impact of Fludrocortisone on the Outcomes of Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Patients: A Retrospective Analysis 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.