Development and Validation of the VIOSync Sepsis Prediction Index: A Novel Machine Learning Model for Sepsis Prediction in ICU Patients
Liliopoulos, S. G.; Dejaco, A.; Paseiro-Garcia, L.; Dimakopoulos, V. S.; Gkouzionis, I. A.
Show abstract
BackgroundSepsis is the third leading cause of death worldwide and the main cause of in-hospital mortality. Despite decades of research, sepsis remains a major challenge faced by patients, clinicians, and medical systems worldwide. Early identification and prediction of patients at risk of sepsis and adverse outcomes associated with sepsis are critical. In this work, we aimed to develop an artificial intelligence algorithm that can predict sepsis early. Materials and MethodsWe developed a predictive model for sepsis using data from the Physionet Cardiology Challenge 2019 ICU database. Our cohort consisted of adult patients who were admitted to the ICU. Sepsis diagnoses were determined using the Sepsis-3 criteria. The model, built with the XGBoost algorithm, was designed to anticipate sepsis prior to the appearance of clinical symptoms. An internal validation was conducted using a hold-off test dataset to evaluate the AI models predictive performance. ResultsWe have developed the VIOSync Sepsis Prediction Index (SPI), an AI-based predictive model designed to forecast sepsis up to six hours before its clinical onset, as defined by Sepsis-3 criteria. The AI model, trained on a dataset comprising approximately 40,000 adult patients, integrates variables such as vital signs, laboratory data, and demographic information. The model demonstrated a high prediction accuracy rate of 97%, with a sensitivity of 87% and a specificity of 98% in predicting sepsis up to 6 hours before the onset. When compared to the established qSOFA score, which has a specificity of 89% for sepsis prediction, our VIOSync SPI algorithm significantly enhances predictive reliability, potentially reducing false positive rates by a factor of 5.5. ConclusionsThe VIOSync SPI demonstrated superior prediction performance over current sepsis early warning scores and predictive algorithms for sepsis onset. To validate the generalizability of our method across populations and treatment protocols, external validation studies are essential.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Identification of predictive patient characteristics for assessing the probability of COVID-19 in-hospital mortality 95%
- External validation of a paediatric SMART triage model for use in resource limited facilities 91%
- Predictability and Stability Testing to Assess Clinical Decision Instrument Performance for Children After Blunt Torso Trauma 91%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- A comparison of machine learning models versus clinical evaluation for mortality prediction in patients with sepsis 96%
- A Machine Learning-Based Prediction of Hospital Mortality in Mechanically Ventilated ICU Patients 95%
- Development of a Risk Prediction Model for Sepsis-Related Delirium Based on Multiple Machine Learning Approaches and an Online Calculator 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- SWIFT: A Deep Learning Approach to Prediction of Hypoxemic Events in Critically-Ill Patients Using SpO 2 Waveform Prediction 93%
- Predicting the causative pathogen among children with pneumonia using a causal Bayesian network 92%
- Deep learning approach for automatic assessment of schizophrenia and bipolar disorder in patients using R-R intervals 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.