Could behaviour change techniques be used to address under-recognition of work-related asthma in primary care? A systematic review
Walters, G. I.; Foley, H.; Huntley, C. C.; Naveed, A.; Nettleton, K.; Reilly, C.; Thomas, M.; Walker, C.; Wheeler, K.
Show abstract
IntroductionWork-related asthma (WRA) is prevalent yet under-recognized in UK primary care. The aim of this systematic review was to identify behaviour change interventions (BCI) intended for use in a primary care setting to identify any chronic disease, that may be used in the context of WRA. The study was registered on the PROPSPERO database (19/04/2023; CRD42023418316) and received no funding. MethodsWe searched CCRCT, Embase, PsychINFO and Ovid MEDLINE databases (1st January 1946 - 6th March 2023) for any observational or experimental study which described the development or evaluation (or both) of a BCI for case finding any chronic disease in a primary care setting, aimed at either healthcare professionals or patients or both. We included case reports, series and conference abstracts, and excluded existing reviews and protocols, and abstracts not in English. Abstracts and subsequent full text articles were assessed by two blinded, independent reviewers, and disagreement resolved by consensus. The primary author undertook quality assessments for a variety of methodologies, with quality control by a second reviewer. We undertook narrative synthesis for a variety of outcomes of usability and effectiveness, and for BCI development. Results18 studies (14 papers and 4 conference abstracts) were included following full-text review, from an initial literature search yielding n=768 citations for screening, of which there were 3 randomised control trials, 1 uncontrolled experimental study, 4 primarily qualitative studies and 10 studies employing recognized multi-step BC methodologies. Quality varied depending upon the methodology used. None of the studies were concerned with identification of asthma. BCIs had been developed for facilitating screening programmes (5), implementing guidelines (5) and individual case finding (8). Six studies measured effectiveness, in terms of screening adherence rates, pre- and post-intervention competency, satisfaction and usability, for clinicians, though none measured diagnostic rates. DiscussionSingle and multi-component BCIs have been developed to aid identification of chronic diseases, though not asthma or work-related asthma specifically. Development for the majority has used BC methodologies that involve gathering data from a range of sources, and develop content specific to defined at-risk populations. Nevertheless, such methodologies could be used similarly to develop a BCI for WRA in primary care settings.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Implementation of predictive risk stratification to reduce emergency admissions to hospital: experiences of general practitioners and practice managers 95%
- Targeted encouragement of GP consultations for possible cancer symptoms: randomised controlled trial 93%
- Changes in General Practice use and costs with COVID-19 and telehealth initiatives 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Wellbeing Impact Study of High-Speed 2 (WISH2): Protocol for a mixed-methods examination of the impact of major transport infrastructure development on mental health and wellbeing 95%
- Beyond social prescribing - the use of social return on investment (SROI) analysis in integrated health and social care interventions in England and Wales: a protocol for a systematic review 94%
- Investigating the use of a one-page infographic to improve recruitment and retention to the BASIL+ Randomised Controlled Trial: A Study Within a Trial (SWAT) 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- How and why do Quality Circles work for General Practitioners - a realist approach 94%
- Face-to-face interventions to encourage enrolment in cardiac rehabilitation; a scoping review protocol 93%
- The use of the positive deviance approach for healthcare system service improvement: A scoping review protocol 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Patients’ perspectives on ecologically sustainable healthcare in general practice 94%
- A mixed-methods evaluation of patients’ views on primary care multi-disciplinary teams in Scotland 93%
- Home monitoring of HbA1c in diabetes mellitus: A protocol for systematic review and narrative synthesis on reliability, accuracy, and patient acceptability 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Is artificial intelligence for medical professionals serving the patients? Protocol for a mixed method systematic review on patient-relevant benefits and harms of algorithmic decision-making 94%
- Understanding the Challenges of Medicine Optimisation Among Older People From Ethnic Minority Communities (Aged 60 Years and Above) With Polypharmacy in Primary Care: A Realist Review Protocol 92%
- Community mobilisation approaches to preventing and reducing adolescent multiple risk behaviour: a realist review protocol 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.