Back

Could behaviour change techniques be used to address under-recognition of work-related asthma in primary care? A systematic review

Walters, G. I.; Foley, H.; Huntley, C. C.; Naveed, A.; Nettleton, K.; Reilly, C.; Thomas, M.; Walker, C.; Wheeler, K.

2024-02-23 primary care research
10.1101/2024.02.22.24303183 medRxiv
Show abstract

IntroductionWork-related asthma (WRA) is prevalent yet under-recognized in UK primary care. The aim of this systematic review was to identify behaviour change interventions (BCI) intended for use in a primary care setting to identify any chronic disease, that may be used in the context of WRA. The study was registered on the PROPSPERO database (19/04/2023; CRD42023418316) and received no funding. MethodsWe searched CCRCT, Embase, PsychINFO and Ovid MEDLINE databases (1st January 1946 - 6th March 2023) for any observational or experimental study which described the development or evaluation (or both) of a BCI for case finding any chronic disease in a primary care setting, aimed at either healthcare professionals or patients or both. We included case reports, series and conference abstracts, and excluded existing reviews and protocols, and abstracts not in English. Abstracts and subsequent full text articles were assessed by two blinded, independent reviewers, and disagreement resolved by consensus. The primary author undertook quality assessments for a variety of methodologies, with quality control by a second reviewer. We undertook narrative synthesis for a variety of outcomes of usability and effectiveness, and for BCI development. Results18 studies (14 papers and 4 conference abstracts) were included following full-text review, from an initial literature search yielding n=768 citations for screening, of which there were 3 randomised control trials, 1 uncontrolled experimental study, 4 primarily qualitative studies and 10 studies employing recognized multi-step BC methodologies. Quality varied depending upon the methodology used. None of the studies were concerned with identification of asthma. BCIs had been developed for facilitating screening programmes (5), implementing guidelines (5) and individual case finding (8). Six studies measured effectiveness, in terms of screening adherence rates, pre- and post-intervention competency, satisfaction and usability, for clinicians, though none measured diagnostic rates. DiscussionSingle and multi-component BCIs have been developed to aid identification of chronic diseases, though not asthma or work-related asthma specifically. Development for the majority has used BC methodologies that involve gathering data from a range of sources, and develop content specific to defined at-risk populations. Nevertheless, such methodologies could be used similarly to develop a BCI for WRA in primary care settings.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
ERJ Open Research
44 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
26.4%
2
BMJ Open Respiratory Research
32 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.6%
3
BJGP Open
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.6%
4
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 24%
7.0%
50% of probability mass above
5
Journal of Sleep Research
31 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.4%
6
British Journal of General Practice
22 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.3%
7
Thorax
32 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.1%
8
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.4%
9
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
10
Pilot and Feasibility Studies
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
11
Pediatric Pulmonology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
12
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 41%
1.7%
13
eClinicalMedicine
55 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
14
Public Health Nutrition
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
15
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.4%
16
JAMA
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.2%
17
Wellcome Open Research
57 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
18
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
19
Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
25 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
20
BMJ Paediatrics Open
21 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
21
Frontiers in Pharmacology
100 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
22
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
23
Respiratory Research
19 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
24
Trials
25 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
25
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
26
Journal of Psychosomatic Research
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
27
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%