Back

SCRAPPY - a single cell rapid assay of proteome perturbation in yeast uncovers a joint role of aromatic amino acids and oxidative stress in the toxicity of lipophilic nucleoside analogs

Ghazy, E.; Bidiuk, V. A.; Ryabov, F.; Mitkevich, O. V.; Riabova, O.; Stanishevskiy, Y. M.; Levshin, I. B.; Alexandrova, L. A.; Jasko, M. V.; Makarov, D. A.; Zhgun, A. A.; Avdanina, D. A.; Ermolyuk, A. A.; Kushnirov, V. V.; Egorova, A. P.; Agaphonov, M. O.; Alexandrov, A. I.

2024-02-20 microbiology
10.1101/2024.02.19.580949 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Assaying cellular responses to antimicrobial molecules is a path to understanding modes of action of potential drugs. This is often achieved via transcriptomics and proteomics, but simple and inexpensive methods for rapid characterization are lacking. To bridge this gap, we assayed changes in the abundance of a panel of 64 "sentinel" proteins fused to GFP in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae using flow cytometry. This method produced expected patterns for classical antifungals and allowed inference of common mechanisms between known and novel compounds. Single-cell data also revealed diverging responses in mitochondrial protein abundance in response to thiazolidine antifungals, and perturbations of the cell cycle caused by various compounds. Finally, the method provided insight into the unknown mode of action of alkylated nucleosides, which can be used against fungi residing on works of art. These substances elevate levels of proteins involved in the biosynthesis of aromatic amino acids (AAA), as well as in oxidative stress. Furthermore, deficiencies of Trp and Tyr biosynthesis increased the efficacy of these compounds, while antioxidants reduced it. Most surprisingly, antioxidant effectiveness relied on AAA biosynthesis. Thus, our approach and its possible modifications for other microbes provides an easy and reliable platform for revealing modes of action of novel compounds.

Published in Communications Biology (predicted rank #28) · training set

Matching journals

The top 12 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Molecules
39 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
13.0%
2
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 21%
8.1%
3
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 14%
5.7%
4
ACS Infectious Diseases
82 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
5.6%
5
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
494 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.7%
6
Frontiers in Microbiology
427 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.5%
7
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
187 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.5%
8
Microbiology Spectrum
469 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.5%
9
ACS Chemical Biology
167 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.5%
10
Biomedicines
67 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.2%
11
Antioxidants
25 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.0%
12
mSphere
302 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.0%
50% of probability mass above
13
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 47%
1.8%
14
Microbiology
65 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.8%
15
Heliyon
152 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.8%
16
Microorganisms
106 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
17
Biochimie
25 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
18
Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy
42 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
19
mBio
833 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.5%
20
ACS Omega
105 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.4%
21
PLOS Pathogens
820 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.2%
22
Journal of Fungi
32 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.0%
23
International Journal of Biological Macromolecules
76 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
24
Biomolecules
100 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
25
Open Biology
106 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
26
Metallomics
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.9%
27
Advanced Biology
29 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.6%
Communications Biology · published here
993 papers in training set
Top 33%
0.6%
29
Biochemical Pharmacology
20 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%
30
Methods
34 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.6%