Back

Anastasis induced by bee venom in normal cells compared to persistent cell death in breast cancer cells

Tetikoglu, S.; Uzuner, U.; Celik Uzuner, S.

2024-02-19 molecular biology
10.1101/2024.02.18.579605 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Anastasis is a phenomenon that has been recently defined as a return from induced apoptosis. Its mechanism has not been clearly elucidated. Anastasis is thought to be involved in the development of drug resistance in cancer cells, however the distinct regulation of anastasis in normal and cancerous cells during anti-cancer therapy has not been discovered. One of the most privileged therapy strategies focuses on the drugs that are selectively cytotoxic in cancer cells but not negatively affect normal cell proliferation. This study for the first time comparatively evaluated the anastatic effect of a common synthetic cytotoxic agent, cisplatin and a natural cytotoxic agent, bee venom. The study showed that bee venom induced anastasis in normal cells (MCF10A, NIH3T3 and ARPE19) but cancer cells (MDA-MB-231 and MCF7) were irreversibly in cell death process. Liver cancer cells (HEPG2) were more resistant to bee venom-induced persistent cell death and tended to recover at higher concentrations compared to breast cancer cells. However, cisplatin induced persistent cell death in both normal and cancerous cells. Besides, selectivity indexes of bee venom in terms of IC50 values were higher than cisplatin. This study indicates that bee venom produces such an effect by selectively inducing anastasis only in normal cells suggesting that bee venom has prominent potential for cancer therapy, in particular for breast cancer, with recovery and maintenance of normal cells viability. Graphical Abstract O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=136 SRC="FIGDIR/small/579605v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (39K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@4ba438org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@a7982org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1af5950org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@110d199_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG

Matching journals

The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 21%
8.1%
2
Heliyon
152 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.1%
3
Biomolecules
100 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.9%
4
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 15%
5.6%
5
Gene
46 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.5%
6
Journal of Biomolecular Structure and Dynamics
43 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.1%
7
Journal of Biosciences
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.1%
8
Biochemistry and Biophysics Reports
30 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.3%
9
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
494 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.3%
10
Pharmaceuticals
34 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.3%
50% of probability mass above
11
Cells
249 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.3%
12
Molecular Biology Reports
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.5%
13
Frontiers in Oncology
103 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.2%
14
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 47%
1.8%
15
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.8%
16
Biomedicines
67 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
17
Molecules
39 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.5%
18
Biology Open
156 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.4%
19
Antioxidants
25 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
20
Pathogens
56 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.2%
21
Biochimie
25 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.2%
22
Cell Death Discovery
58 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.2%
23
Life
29 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
24
Biology Methods and Protocols
61 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
25
Frontiers in Pharmacology
111 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
26
Current Microbiology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
27
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
98 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
28
Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications
84 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
29
ACS Omega
105 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
30
Medical Research Archives
11 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.6%