Non-invasive Brain Stimulation as Treatment for Motor Impairment in People with Parkinsons Disease: Protocol for an Umbrella Review
Harris, D.; O'Bryan, S.; Latella, C.
Show abstract
IntroductionParkinsons disease (PD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder that predominantly affects movement and currently has no cure. Alongside medication, non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) may be used as an adjunct therapy to attenuate the motor symptoms experienced by people with PD. However, there is considerable heterogeneity in the evidence exploring the effects of NIBS for improving aspects of physical function in people with PD. Therefore, this protocol paper will outline the objectives, structure and procedure of a proposed umbrella review which will comprehensively summarise and map the current body evidence on the effectiveness of NIBS for improving physical function in people with PD. Methods and analysisThis study will adhere to the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) reviewers manual and the PRISMA guidelines for conducting an umbrella review. The protocol is registered in PROSPERO (CRD42022380544). The population, intervention, comparison, and outcomes (PICO) method will be used to guide the search strategies and inclusion/exclusion criteria. Systematic reviews, with or without meta-analyses, based on quantitative or mixed-methods studies, will be searched for, and then critically evaluated by two authors using the Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews 2 (AMSTAR2) tool. If the data allows, we will run a random effects pooled meta-analysis using standardized mean differences (SMDs), with heterogeneity and publication bias reported using the I2 statistic. We will determine the level of evidence using the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations) tool. Overlap in studies across reviews will be assessed using citation matrices and corrected covered areas (CCAs). Lastly, visual bubble plots will display the effects and strength of evidence from each review. Ethics and disseminationEthics approval is not required as data will be searched for and gathered based on the published systematic reviews and meta-analyses. We plan to publish the results of this umbrella review in a peer-reviewed journal and will be presented at a neurology or neurostimulation conference. All the relevant additional data will also be uploaded to the online open access databases. PROSPERO registration numberCRD42022380544
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Exploring how PRIME-Parkinson care is implemented and whether, how and why it produces change, for who and under what conditions: a protocol for an embedded process evaluation within the PRIME-UK randomised controlled trial 93%
- Digital game-based interventions for cognitive training in healthy adults and adults with cognitive impairment: Protocol for a two-part systematic review and meta-analysis 93%
- Developing a core outcome set for interventions in people with mild cognitive impairment: study protocol 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Fox Insight Collects Online, Longitudinal Patient-Reported Outcomes and Genetic Data on Parkinson's Disease 90%
- WearGait-PD: An Open-Access Wearables Dataset for Gait in Parkinson's Disease and Age-Matched Controls 89%
- SPIRIT-CONSORT-TM: a corpus for assessing transparency of clinical trial protocol and results publications 88%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Efficacy of Acupuncture on Lower Limb Motor Dysfunction Following Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. 93%
- Investigating the impact of physical activity on mitochondrial function in Parkinson's disease (PARKEX): Study protocol for a randomised controlled clinical trial 93%
- Device-aided therapies (DATs) in Parkinson’s disease (PD). The DATs-PD GETM Spanish Registry Protocol Study 93%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.