Back

HLA-A*03:01 is associated with visceral leishmaniasis development in people living with HIV in Ethiopia

de Vrij, N.; Vandoren, R.; Ramadan, K.; Van Hul, A.; Kassa, M.; Melkamu, R.; Yeshanew, A.; Bogale, T.; Beyene, H.; Sisay, K.; Kibret, A.; Mersha, D.; Cuypers, W. L.; Vogt, F.; van Henten, S.; Ritmeijer, K.; Pham, T.-T.; Meysman, P.; Laukens, K.; Cuypers, B.; Diro, E.; Mohammed, R.; van Griensven, J.; Adriaensen, W.

2024-02-18 infectious diseases
10.1101/2024.02.16.24302942 medRxiv
Show abstract

Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) co-infection is a major challenge for visceral leishmaniasis (VL) control, particularly in Ethiopia where the incidence of both pathogens is high. VL-HIV often leads to high rates of antileishmanial treatment failure and recurrent VL disease relapses. Considering the high prevalence of HIV and Leishmania in the Ethiopian population, preventing the progression of asymptomatic Leishmania infection to disease would be a valuable asset to VL disease control and to the clinical management of people living with HIV (PLWH). However, such a strategy requires good understanding of risk factors for VL development. In immunocompetent individuals living in Brazil, India, or Iran, the Human Leukocyte Antigen (HLA) gene region has been associated with VL development. We used NanoTYPE(R), an Oxford Nanopore Technologies sequencing-based HLA genotyping method, to detect associations between HLA genotype and VL development by comparing 78 PLWH with VL history and 46 PLWH that controlled a Leishmania infection, all living in a VL endemic region of North-West Ethiopia. We identified a strong association between HLA-A*03:01 and increased risk of VL development (OR = 3.89). These data provide candidate HLA alleles that can be further explored for inclusion in a potential Leishmania screen-and-treat strategy in VL endemic regions.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.