Back

Healthcare Worker Staffing Ratios Affect Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Acquisition

Johnson, S. S.; Mietchen, M. S.; Lofgren, E. T.

2024-02-15 epidemiology
10.1101/2024.02.14.24302485 medRxiv
Show abstract

ImportanceThis study addresses the pressing clinical question of how variations in physician and nursing staffing levels influence methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) rates, providing essential insights for optimizing staff allocation and improving patient outcomes in critical care settings. ObjectiveThe main objective is to assess whether variations in staffing ratios and workload conceptualization significantly alter the rates of MRSA acquisitions in the ICU setting. DesignThis simulation-based study utilizes stochastic compartmental mathematical modeling to explore the impact of staffing ratios and workload conceptualization on MRSA acquisitions in ICUs. Derived from a previously published model, the analysis involves running year-long stochastic simulations for each scenario 1000 times, varying nurse-to-patient ratios and intensivist staffing levels under infinite and finite workload conceptualizations. Our baseline model was a 3:1 nurse ratio with one intensivist. Main OutcomeMRSA acquisitions in ICUs, measured as median acquisitions per 1000 person-years. ResultsUnder baseline conditions, our model had a median of 8.2 MRSA acquisitions per 1000 person-years. Varying patient-to-nurse ratios and intensivist numbers showed substantial impacts. For infinite models, a 2:1 nurse ratio resulted in a 21% decrease, while a 1:1 nurse ratio led to a 65% reduction. Finite models demonstrated even larger effects, with a 48% decrease when having a 2:1 ratio, and an 83% reduction with a 1:1 nurse ratio. Reducing patient-to-nurse ratios in finite models increased acquisitions exponentially with a 348% increase for a 6:1 ratio. Intensivist variations had modest impacts. Conclusions and RelevanceOur study highlights the crucial role of optimizing staffing levels in ICUs for effective MRSA infection control. While intensivist variations have modest effects, bolstering nursing ratios significantly reduces MRSA acquisitions, underscoring the need for tailored staffing strategies, and recognizing the nuanced impact of workload conceptualization. Our findings offer practical insights for refining staffing protocols, emphasizing the dynamic nature of healthcare-associated infection outcomes. Key PointsO_ST_ABSQuestionC_ST_ABSHow does the conceptualization of ICU healthcare worker tasks in models--whether infinite or finite-- impact the results of changes in staffing ratios affecting methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) acquisition? FindingsIn this compartmental mathematical model approach that included 15 different models, the trends of the impact of staffing ratios were consistent between the Infinite and Finite tasks models. However, both the absolute and relative values were markedly different, with the infinite task models having a much more linear effect on MRSA acquisitions while the number of MRSA cases in the finite model continued to rise exponentially as the number of nurses decreased. MeaningIt is essential when considering model generalizability, to state the assumptions made about how workload and contact patterns within a hospital work, and to ensure these are appropriately tailored for the specific setting being modeled.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.2%
2
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 2%
14.3%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 19%
10.0%
4
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 4%
6.3%
5
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
6
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.6%
7
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 48%
2.3%
8
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
9
Epidemics
104 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.7%
10
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
11
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
134 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
12
CMAJ Open
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.5%
13
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.5%
14
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
15
BMC Health Services Research
42 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
16
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.1%
17
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
18
BMJ Global Health
98 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
19
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
20
mSystems
361 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
21
Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence
18 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
22
Life
27 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
23
Vaccines
196 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
24
Critical Care Explorations
15 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
25
Canadian Medical Association Journal
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
26
Epidemiology and Infection
84 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
27
JAC-Antimicrobial Resistance
13 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
28
Wellcome Open Research
57 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
29
Journal of Infection
71 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
30
Physical Biology
43 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%