Scientific Evidence of Prostate Cancer Progression Outcomes in Transgender Females after Hormone Replacement Therapy. A Scoping Review Protocol.
Caromile, L. A.; McAllister, B.; Panteah, M.; Nelson, E.; Petersen, B.; Hoskins, K.; Koshy-Chenthittayil, S.
Show abstract
Transgender females undergoing hormone replacement therapy (HRT) as a component of the gender affirmation treatment (GAT) commonly retain their prostate, rendering them susceptible to developing prostate cancer (PC). Currently, patients with localized PC receive endocrine therapy (e.g., androgen ablation/castration). Once metastatic, patients undergo standard chemotherapy and/or novel treatment. Unfortunately, many fail to respond completely and develop untreatable, drug-resistant tumors consistent with reprogramming of crucial cell signal transduction pathways that promote tumor growth, invasiveness, and survival. There is no consensus among scientists or physicians on how HRT affects PC treatment options or its related signaling pathways, putting patients at risk for delayed diagnosis. This scoping review aims to analyze and collate the current scientific literature on PC progression in transgender females who have undergone HRT and how PC-initiated oncogenic pathways are impacted by HRT. The reviews findings can potentially inform transgender healthcare and research. This scoping review will follow the Population-Concept-Context methodology for Joanna Briggs Institution Scoping Reviews. Relevant peer-reviewed studies will be identified from the following electronic databases: MEDLINE (PubMed), Embase (Elsevier), CINAHL (EBSCO), and Scopus (Elsevier). Sources of unpublished studies/ grey literature to be searched include bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), medRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), and MedNar (Deep Web Technologies). The search strings using keywords such as gender-affirmation treatment, transgender females, and prostate cancer will be conducted using Boolean logic. There will be no limitation on language or date of publication.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Menopause education of healthcare professionals: A scoping review protocol 93%
- Short-term outcomes of pubertal suppression in a selected cohort of 12 to 15 year old young people with persistent gender dysphoria in the UK 93%
- Gender-affirming care, mental health, and economic stability in the time of COVID-19: a global cross-sectional study of transgender and non-binary people 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Men and sexual and reproductive healthcare in the Nordic countries: a scoping review 91%
- Protocol summary and statistical analysis plan for the randomized trial of early detection of clinically significant prostate cancer (ProScreen) 91%
- Moving forward through consensus: a national Delphi approach to determine the top research priorities in prostate cancer in Uganda 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Hepatic steatosis and steatohepatitis: a functional meta-analysis of sex-based differences in transcriptomic studies 92%
- Are we moving the dial? Canadian Health Research Funding Trends for Women's Health, 2S/LGBTQ+ Health, Sex, or Gender Considerations 92%
- Sex and Gender Considerations in Reporting Guidelines of Health Research: A Systematic Review 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Partial rejuvenation of the spermatogonial stem cell niche after gender-affirming hormone therapy in trans women 93%
- Clinical benefits and adverse effects of genetically-elevated free testosterone levels: a Mendelian randomization analysis 92%
- Cervicovaginal immune mediators increase when young women begin to have sexual intercourse: a prospective study and meta-analysis 91%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.