Back

Prospective Clinical Evaluation of a Deep Learning Algorithm for Guided Point-of-Care Ultrasonography Screening of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms

Chiu, I.-M.; Chen, T.-Y.; Zheng, Y.-C.; Lin, X.-H.; Cheng, F.-J.; Ouyang, D.; Cheng, C.-Y.

2024-02-08 cardiovascular medicine
10.1101/2024.02.06.24302423 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundAbdominal Aortic Aneurysm (AAA) is a critical condition that can lead to fatal consequences if not detected and treated early. Despite the high prevalence in smokers and guideline recommendation for screening, AAA often remains undetected due to availability of diagnostic ultrasound examinations. This prospective clinical trial aimed to investigate the use of a Deep Learning (DL) algorithm to guide AAA screening. MethodsThis prospective, comparative diagnostic study was conducted at the Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital. We developed and deployed an object detection-based DL algorithm providing real-time guidance for novice users performing AAA screening using point of care ultrasound. 10 registered nurses with no prior ultrasonography experience were recruited and performed at least 15 scans on patients over 65 years old to acquire abdominal aorta videos. These scans were compared with those of physicians using the same ultrasound hardware but without DL guidance. ResultsA total of 184 patients (median [IQR] age of 72 [67-79], and 105 (57.1%) male) completed this study. The DL-guided novices achieved adequate scan quality in 87.5% (95% CI: 82.7 - 92.3%) of patients, comparable to the 91.3% (95% CI: 87.2-95.4%) rate of physician scans (p=0.310). This performance did not vary by BMI. The DL model predicted AAA with an AUC of 0.975, showing 100% sensitivity and 94.3% specificity. The DL model predicted the maximal width of abdominal aorta with mean absolute error of 2.8mm compared to physician measurements. 3 AAA with maximal width of aorta > 3cm were found in this study cohort. ConclusionDL-guided POCUS is an effective tool for AAA screening, providing comparable performance to experienced physicians. The use of this DL system could democratize AAA screening and improve access, thereby aiding in early disease detection and treatment. Clinical PerspectiveO_ST_ABSWhat is NewC_ST_ABSO_LIOur study presents a deep learning (DL) guidance system that enables novice users to perform Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm (AAA) screening with POCUS, yielding image quality comparable to experienced physicians. C_LIO_LIThe DL algorithm accurately identifies AAA from scans conducted by novice users, maintains consistent performance across patients with varying BMIs, and demonstrates increased scan efficiency with repeated use. C_LI Clinical ImplicationsO_LIDL-guided POCUS can potentially expand AAA screening capabilities to non-specialist settings and increase throughput for screening at risk individuals. C_LIO_LIThe implementation of our DL model for AAA screening could enhance early detection, particularly in underserved areas, but also optimize clinical workflows by decreasing diagnostic wait times and increasing ultrasound utilization efficiency. C_LI

Matching journals

The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.5%
2
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 10%
8.3%
3
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 3%
7.3%
4
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 27%
6.5%
5
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
4.4%
6
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.0%
7
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
49 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.7%
8
Diagnostics
48 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.6%
9
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.9%
10
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.9%
50% of probability mass above
11
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.4%
12
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
13
The American Journal of Cardiology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.1%
14
European Radiology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.8%
15
Journal of Biomechanics
57 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
16
Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
27 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
17
Open Heart
19 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.7%
18
Atherosclerosis
29 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.5%
19
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
34 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.5%
20
Heliyon
146 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
21
BMJ Health & Care Informatics
13 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.4%
22
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.2%
23
European Heart Journal - Digital Health
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
24
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 49%
1.2%
25
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
26
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
39 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
27
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 61%
0.8%
28
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
29
Biology Methods and Protocols
53 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
30
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%