Back

New Reference Values for Thyroid Volume by Ultrasound in German Children and Adolescents Under Iodine-Sufficient Conditions from a Population-Based Study

Hirtz, R.; Thamm, R.; Kuhnert, R.; Liesenkoetter, K.-P.; Thamm, M.; Grasemann, C.

2024-01-31 endocrinology
10.1101/2024.01.31.24301932 medRxiv
Show abstract

ContextReliable reference values for thyroid ultrasound measurements are essential to effectively guide individual diagnostics and direct health care measures at the population level, such as iodine fortification programs. However, the latest reference values for total thyroid volume (Tvol) provided by the WHO in 2004 only apply to the 6 to 12-year-old age group and are limited to countries with a long history of iodine sufficiency, which does not reflect the situation in most European countries, including Germany. ObjectiveThe present aims to derive up to date thyroid volume ultrasound reference values in German children and adolescents. DesignData from the baseline assessment of a nationwide study in German children and adolescents (KiGGS) conducted between 2003 and 2006 were used to determine sex-specific reference values for Tvol in thyroid-healthy participants aged 6 to 17 years by age and body surface area (BSA) according to the Lambda-Mu-Sigma (LMS) method. ResultsData from 5559 participants were available for reference chart construction (girls: 2509 (45.1%)). On average, the 97th percentile is 33.4% and 28.5% higher than the corresponding WHOs reference values for boys and girls, respectively. These findings are consistent with most other studies in German and European children and adolescents at a similar time of investigation. Notably, the sample used for this study was iodine-sufficient according to WHO criteria. ConclusionsThe reference values provided by the WHO are overly conservative for this population and could potentially apply to apply to other European countries with a similar history of iodine supply.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.