Prevalence of ocular manifestations in cutaneous rosacea: Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
Nazzicone, K.; Kirkpatrick, R. H.; Biorac, A.; Froentjes, A. R.; Molin, S.; Simpson, S. M.
Show abstract
Introduction: Rosacea is a chronic inflammatory skin condition with concomitant ocular manifestations and neurogenic symptoms. Ocular rosacea poses a particular diagnostic challenge as its signs and symptoms often overlap with other ocular pathologies. Cutaneous and ocular rosacea present together in approximately 21-50% of patients, yet a solid understanding of comorbid ocular and cutaneous symptoms is lacking. Therefore, the present paper outlines a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis to describe and quantify the prevalence of ocular rosacea in cutaneous rosacea and each of its subtypes. Methods: This study will follow Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and be conducted using the systematic review software, Covidence. To determine inclusion, screening will occur at two levels (title and abstract-only followed by full-text) and will be completed separately by two authors. Primary research studies on ocular rosacea in adult cutaneous rosacea published in all languages and geographic regions until November 2023 will be reviewed for inclusion. Data pertaining to overall prevalence of ocular rosacea across and within cutaneous rosacea subtypes, mean age, sex, gender, ethnicity, socioeconomic status, time to diagnosis, time to treatment, and prevalence of comorbid conditions will be extracted. For each included study, the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE) framework will be applied to assess study quality. Conclusion: To the authors knowledge, this will be the first systematic review and meta-analysis comparing the prevalence of ocular rosacea in the various cutaneous subtypes in an adult population. By addressing this knowledge gap, this study aims to provide clear and easily interpretable data to aid in the early diagnosis and treatment of ocular rosacea. This study is registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO ID# CRD42023475026). Key MessageProtocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis investigating the prevalence of ocular manifestations in adult rosacea
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Risk Factors, Clinical Outcomes and Prognostic Factors of Bacterial Keratitis: The Nottingham Infectious Keratitis Study 93%
- Biologic Drug Survival in Psoriasis: A Systematic Review & Comparative Meta-Analysis 90%
- An osmolarity dependent mechanism partially ameliorates retinal cysts and rescues cone function in a mouse model of X-linked Retinoschisis. 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Reconstructed human pigmented skin/epidermis models achieve epidermal pigmentation through melanocore transfer. 88%
- Melanocortin-1 receptor (MC1R) genotypes do not correlate with size in two cohorts of medium-to-giant congenital melanocytic nevi 88%
- Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion in the Melanoma Research Community 87%
Similar papers in this journal
- Development of a Core Outcome Measure Instrument; “LeishCOM_LCL”, for Localised Cutaneous Leishmaniasis 94%
- Health-Related Quality of Life of Adults with Cutaneous Leishmaniasis at ALERT Hospital, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia 91%
- Post-kala-azar dermal leishmaniasis (PKDL) drug efficacy study landscape: a systematic scoping review of clinical trials and observational studies to assess the feasibility of establishing an individual participant-level data (IPD) platform 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- The vitamin A ester retinyl propionate has a unique metabolic profile and higher retinoid-related bioactivity over retinol and retinyl palmitate in human skin models. 90%
- Comparative Transcriptome Analysis of Acne vulgaris, Rosacea, and Hidradenitis Suppurativa Supports High Dose Dietary Zinc as a Therapeutic Agent 89%
- MTOR promotes basal cell carcinoma growth through atypical PKC 86%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.