An Open-label Clinical Study of Brief Submaximal Cardiopulmonary Testing in Pre-surgical Evaluation: Feasibility of implementation
Carr, Z. J.; Agarkov, D.; Li, J.; Charchaflieh, J.; Brenes-Bastos, A.; Freund, J.; Zafar, J.; Schonberger, R. B.; Heerdt, P.
Show abstract
ObjectivesWe tested the logistic feasibility of integrating brief submaximal cardiopulmonary exercise testing (smCPET) in a pre-surgical evaluation (PSE) clinic. DesignProspective open-label clinical device trial. SettingPre-surgical evaluation clinic. Participants43 participants who met criteria of i) age > 60 years old, ii) revised cardiac risk index of <2, iii) self-reported metabolic equivalents (METs) of >4.6 (i.e. ability to climb 2 flights of stairs), and iv) presenting for noncardiac surgery. InterventionsPre-intervention self-reported METs, Duke Activity Status Index (DASI) surveys, smCPET trial, Borg survey of perceived exertion, and post-intervention survey. Measurements: Feasibility endpoints were 1) operational efficiency as measured by length of time of experimental session < 20 minutes, 2) no more than moderate perceived physical exertion as quantified by a modified Borg survey of perceived exertion of <7 in the absence of observed complications, 3) high participant satisfaction with smCPET task execution, represented as a score of >8, and 4) high patient satisfaction with scheduling of smCPET testing, represented as a score of >8. ResultsSession time was 16.9 minutes ({+/-}6.8). Post-test modified Borg survey was 5.35 ({+/-}1.8), corresponding to moderate perceived exertion. Satisfaction [on a scale of 1 (worst) to 10 (best)] regarding ease of smCPET tasks was 9.6 ({+/-}0.7) and mean patient satisfaction with smCPET scheduling was 9.5 ({+/-}1.5). Operational efficiency was achieved after 10-15 experimental sessions. ConclusionsOur findings suggest that smCPET integration in a PSE clinic; 1) is time efficient 2) shows high participant satisfaction with task, and 3) rapidly achieved operational efficiency. Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov Registration: #NCT05743673. Principal Investigator: Zyad J. Carr, M.D. Date of Registration: 5-12-2023. Strengths and limitations of this studyO_LIWe examined patient-and logistic-centered acceptance of study procedures within the environment of a high-volume preoperative surgical evaluation clinic. C_LIO_LIStudy procedures were well tolerated, and participants readily accepted submaximal cardiopulmonary exercise testing with high satisfaction with device use, scheduling, and perceived exertion. C_LIO_LIUser operational efficiency developed over 10-15 sessions of use. C_LIO_LIThis feasibility study met our proposed endpoints but is comprised of a small sample of participants, limiting its generalizability to larger populations. C_LI
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Apple Watch and Withings Evaluation of Symptoms, Treatment, and Rhythm in those Undergoing Cardioversion (AWE STRUCk): A Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial 94%
- HEART rate variability biofeedback for LOng Covid symptoms (HEARTLOC): protocol for a feasibility study 94%
- Feasibility study of a randomised controlled trial of pre and postoperative nutritional supplementation in major lung surgery 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Multimodal Prehabilitation in People Awaiting Acute Inpatient Cardiac Surgery: Study Protocol for a Pilot Feasibility Trial (PreP-ACe) 95%
- Hemodynamic profiles by non-invasive monitoring of cardiac index and vascular tone in acute heart failure patients in the emergency department: external validation and clinical outcomes 94%
- Integrating remote monitoring into heart failure patients’ care regimen: A pilot study 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Elevated heart rate after non-cardiac surgery: post-hoc analysis of a prospective observational cohort study 93%
- Effect of Telemedicine Support for Intraoperative Anaesthesia Care on Postoperative Outcomes: The TECTONICS Randomised Clinical Trial 92%
- Effect of Machine Learning on Anaesthesiology Clinician Prediction of Postoperative Complications: The Perioperative ORACLE Randomised Clinical Trial 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- A Predictive Nomogram for In-ICU Deterioration of Stage 1 Pressure Injuries: A Retrospective Study 91%
- Regional pleural strain measurements during mechanical ventilation using ultrasound elastography: A randomised, crossover, proof of concept physiologic study 90%
- The Role of Disease Severity and Demographics in the Clinical Course of COVID-19 Patients Treated with Convalescent Plasma 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Patient Risk-Benefit Preferences for Transcatheter versus Surgical Mitral Valve Repair 94%
- Non-Invasive Scale Measurement of Cardiac Output Compared with the Gold-Standard Direct Fick Method: A Feasibility Study 94%
- Smartwatch Facilitated Remote Health Care for Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Amid COVID-19 Pandemic 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.