Back

The effects of intermittent or continuous exercise on renal haemodynamics during moderate-intensity exercise

Kawakami, S.; Yasuno, T.; Kawakami, S.; Ito, A.; Fujimi, K.; Matsuda, T.; Nakashima, S.; Masutani, K.; Uehara, Y.; Higaki, Y.; Michishita, R.

2024-01-26 nephrology
10.1101/2024.01.23.24301695 medRxiv
Show abstract

PurposeModerate-intensity exercise has beneficial effects for individuals with CKD. However, it is unclear whether intermittent exercise (IE) has a different effect on renal haemodynamics compared to continuous exercise (CE). This study aimed to compare the effects of intermittent or continuous exercise on renal haemodynamics and renal injury during moderate-intensity exercise. MethodsTen males underwent IE or CE to consider the effect of exercise on renal haemodynamics during moderate-intensity exercise. Renal haemodynamic assessment and blood-sampling were conducted before exercise (pre) and immediately (post 0), 30-min (post 30), and 60-min (post 60) after exercise. Urine-sampling was conducted in pre, post 0 and post 60. ResultsThere was no condition-by-time interaction (p = 0.073), condition (p = 0.696), or time (p = 0.433) effects regarding renal blood flow. There was a condition-by-time interaction effect regarding noradrenaline concentrations (p = 0.037). Moreover, both conditions significantly increased noradrenaline concentration at post 0 (IE: p = 0.003, CE: p < 0.001) and remained significantly higher in post 30 (p < 0.001) and post 60 (p < 0.001). Significant difference was found in noradrenaline concentrations at post 0 when comparing IE and CE (399 {+/-} 119 vs. 552 {+/-} 224 pg/ml, p = 0.037). Urinary neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin concentrations increased at post 60 (p = 0.009), but none of them exceeded the cutoff values for the definition of renal damage. Other renal injury biomarkers showed a similar pattern. ConclusionThese findings suggest that IE has a similar effect on renal haemodynamics and function, and AKI biomarkers compared to CE.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.