Quality Of Life And Its Determinants Among Infertile And Non-Infertile Women: A Case-Control Study In Gandaki Province, Nepal
Regmi, R.; Yadav, D. K.; Tiwari, S.
Show abstract
IntroductionInfertility is highly stressful to married couple and has various social and psychological problems leading adverse impact on quality of life. The study examined the quality of life and factors associated with quality of life among infertile and non-infertile women. Materials and MethodsCase control study was carried out among infertile and non-infertile women to compare their QoL using the World Health Organisation Quality of Life-BREF (WHOQOL-BREF) questionnaire. Altogether 92 married women of reproductive age 20-49 facing infertility/subfertility problems were selected as cases and controls were selected in 1:1 ratio with cases after matching.The written and verbal inform consent was taken from patients and ethical approval was taken from NHRC. Epi-data was used for data entry and data was analyzed using SPSS. The data collection in this study was from May 20 2019 to June 20 2019. Multivariable analysis was applied to the variable after bivariate analysis for the adjustment. ResultsThe prevalence of infertility was found 9.1%, among then 43.5% had primary and 56.5% secondary infertility. The mean age of marriage of infertile women was significantly higher than that of non-infertile women (p 0.001).The average BMI score of infertile women was significantly higher than that of non-infertile women (p 0.001). Similarly the average perceived stress score among infertile women (28.9{+/-}4.61) and non infertile women (25.27{+/-}3.36), average anxiety score among infertile women (8.71{+/-}3.0) and among non-infertile (7.78{+/-}2.89), and average depression score among infertile women (8.14{+/-}2.67) and among non-infertile (6.86{+/-}2.49) were significantly higher in infertile women than non-infertile women. The total and subscale wise perceived social support score of infertile women was significantly lower than non-infertile women (p<0.001). The overall and inter-domain QoL score of infertile women was significantly lower than non-infertile women (p<0.001). Family planning methods used before first child (AOR-16.59, p=0.025), occupation (AOR-16.88, p=0.023) and induced abortion (AOR-0.086, p=0.047) were found as significant determinants of infertility at 95% CI. Among infertile women, only two factors, perceived stress (AOR-10.13, 95% CI: 3.52-29.18) and perceived social support (AOR-3.412, 95% CI: 1.15-10.101) found as important determinants of quality of life among infertile women, where as moderate to severe level of depression (AOR-14.61, 95% CI: 2.37-89.96); mild level of depression (AOR-3.42, 95% CI: 1.08-10.86), perceived social support (AOR-4.94, 95% CI: 1.51-16.14) and RH problems (AOR-3.539, 95% CI: 1.01-12.46) found as the determinants of quality of life among control (non-infertile women). ConclusionThe findings of this study revealed that the overall and inter domain quality of life of infertile women were lower than that of non-infertile women. A community-based and multicultural study involving more districts may shed more light on this topic in future research. Health service strengthening, priority to infertility in RH programs and counseling sessions should be incorporated as part of the holistic approach in the day-to-day management of the infertile women.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Prevalence of short interpregnancy interval and its associated factors among pregnant women in Debre Berhan town, Ethiopia 97%
- Health-Related Quality of Life and Coping Strategies adopted by COVID-19 survivors: A nationwide cross-sectional study in Bangladesh 97%
- Prevalence and Determinants of Caesarean Section in South and South-east Asian Women 97%
Similar papers in this journal
- Comparative study between first and second wave of COVID-19 deaths in India - a single center study 94%
- Association between Hormonal Contraceptive Use and Lipedema: A Cross-Sectional Study with 637 Brazilian Women 94%
- Influence of Factor V Leiden mutation and Protein C/S deficiencies on preeclampsia among Sudanese women 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Knowledge, perception, and attitude toward premarital screening among university students in Kurdistan region- Iraq 97%
- Predictors of voluntary uptake of modern contraceptive methods in rural Sindh, Pakistan 97%
- Prevalence and associated factors of gender-based violence for female: Evidence from school students in Nepal- a cross sectional study 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Spatial variation in the non-use of modern contraception and its predictors in Bangladesh 95%
- Climate influences scrub typhus occurrence in Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India: Analysis of a 15 year dataset 92%
- Classification models for Invasive Ductal Carcinoma Progression, based on gene expression data-trained supervised machine learning 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Anxiety appraisal in mothers of preterm neonates admitted in critical care unit 94%
- Acceptability, willingness to use and preferred distribution models of oral-based HIV self-testing kits among key and priority populations enrolled in HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis clinics in central Uganda. A mixed-methods cross-sectional study 91%
- Normalized Semi-Covariance Co-Efficiency Analysis of Spike Proteins from SARS-CoV-2 variant Omicron and Other Coronaviruses for their Infectivity and Virulence 89%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.