Sociodemographic Factors Associated with Antenatal Steroid Exposure among Late Preterm Births
Clapp, M. A.; Cohen, J.; Gyamfi-Bannerman, C.; Kaimal, A.; Lorch, S.; Wright, J.; Melamed, A.
Show abstract
As the risk of preterm birth is known to vary widely, we aimed to determine if antenatal steroid exposure among LPBs varied based on sociodemographic characteristics. We hypothesized that sociodemographic factors may influence a provider s clinical judgment of a patient s likelihood of preterm birth and, therefore, also be associated with antenatal steroid use. This cross-sectional analysis used the 2021 US natality data and included non-anomalous, liveborn, hospital-based singleton births at [≥]34 weeks of gestation to mothers without diabetes, a cohort similar to those in the ALPS Trial. The following sociodemographic factors were compared among those who received vs. did not receive steroids using chi-square tests: age, race (as designated and categorized on the birth certificate), ethnicity, primary pay for the delivery, marital status, and education. In 2021, 237,025 late preterm births met eligibility criteria, of which 17.3% were exposed to antenatal steroids. Among the following sociodemographic factors, the odds of antenatal steroid receipt were lower compared to the reference majority population: 1) Black (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 0.88 (95% CI 0.81, 0.96)) and Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander (NHOPI) (aOR 0.58 (95% CI 0.43, 0.79) compared to White race; 2) less than high school education (aOR 0.76 (95% CI 0.72, 0.81)) or high school education (Aor 0.87 (95% CI 0.83, 0.91)) compared to post-secondary education; and 3) public (aOR 0.83 (95% CI 0.78, 0.87)) or no insurance (aOR 0.68 (95% CI 0.61, 0.77)) compared to private insurance. Age and marital status were not associated with steroid receipt. Despite no known differential treatment effects of antenatal steroids by sociodemographic factors, steroid exposure among LBPs varied significantly among races, ethnicities, payers, and education levels in the US.
Matching journals
The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- How do perceptions of Covid-19 risk impact pregnancy-related health decisions? A convergent parallel mixed-methods study protocol 92%
- A compelling symmetry: The extended fetuses-at-risk perspective on modal, optimal and relative birthweight and gestational age 92%
- Effect of caesarean birth on perinatal mortality for singleton breech presentation in spontaneous preterm labour – a target trial emulation using Scottish health record data 91%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Factors determining success of the chronically instrumented unanesthetized fetal sheep model of human development: a retrospective cohort study 90%
- Socioeconomic and comorbid factors affecting mortality and length of stay in COVID-19 90%
- Single-Center Hospital and Outpatient Opioid Use for Lower Extremity Arterial Disease 87%
Similar papers in this journal
- Effect of Vitamin D 3 Supplementation vs Placebo on Hospital Length of Stay in Patients with Severe COVID-19: A Multicenter, Double-blind, Randomized Controlled Trial 88%
- Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Health of Adults in the United States: A 20-Year National Health Interview Survey Analysis, 1999-2018 87%
- General Health Checks in Adult Primary Care: A Review 86%
Similar papers in this journal
- Giving birth under hospital visitor restrictions: Heightened acute stress in childbirth in COVID-19 positive women 91%
- Effect of corticosteroid treatment on 1376 hospitalized COVID-19 patients. A cohort study. 90%
- Synergistic effects of cardiovascular health and social isolation on adverse pregnancy outcomes 89%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.