Back

Sildenafil's Effectiveness in the Primary Coronary Slow Flow Phenomenon: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

Andishmand, A.; Seyed Hossaini, S. M.; Namayandeh, s. M.; Mirjalili, S. R.; Adelzadeh, E.; Entezari, A.

2024-01-20 cardiovascular medicine
10.1101/2024.01.18.24301510 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundOn the one hand, the coronary slow flow phenomenon (CSFP) may cause recurrence of chest pain, prompting medical examinations and further healthcare expenses, and on the other side, it can result in myocardial infarction, ventricular arrhythmia, and sudden cardiac death. ObjectivesDue to the lack of agreement on the optimal treatment for CSFP, we decided to examine the effectiveness of sildenafil in this context. MethodsWe assessed the eligibility of 196 CSFP patients to participate in a 12-week, triple-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study for receiving either 50 mg daily oral sildenafil or placebo. We evaluated the efficacy of sildenafil based on exercise tolerance test parameters, severity of angina, adverse effects, and major adverse cardiovascular events. ResultsTwenty eligible patients were randomly allocated in a 1:1 ratio to two groups. Sildenafil demonstrated significant efficacy in improving angina severity, with all recipients achieving a Class I angina severity, contrasting with a 40% attainment in the placebo group (P=0.011). Notably, Sildenafil induced statistically significant reductions in systolic and diastolic blood pressure, unlike the placebo group. Although a reduction in the QT interval favored Sildenafil (-21 millisecond vs +3 milliseconds), statistical significance was not reached (P=0.09 vs. P=0.67). Moreover, Sildenafil markedly improved Duke Treadmill Score (DTS) (P=0.005), while the placebo group showed non-significant improvement. Concurrently, the Sildenafil group exhibited significant enhancements in functional capacity (METs) and maximum heart rate during exercise testing compared to the placebo group. ConclusionsWe suggest that a daily low dose of sildenafil could be a valuable therapeutic option for CSFP. Graphical abstract O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=128 SRC="FIGDIR/small/24301510v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (28K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@168d767org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@15d806org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@19846corg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@144d9c9_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.2%
2
The American Journal of Cardiology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
10.0%
3
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
49 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
10.0%
4
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 1%
6.2%
5
Open Heart
19 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.8%
50% of probability mass above
6
Frontiers in Pharmacology
100 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
3.5%
7
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 40%
3.5%
8
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.5%
9
International Journal of Cardiology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.0%
10
European Journal of Preventive Cardiology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.6%
11
Medicine
30 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.3%
12
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 51%
2.0%
13
American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology
32 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.0%
14
Heart
10 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.9%
15
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
16
Atherosclerosis
29 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.5%
17
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.3%
18
JMIR Research Protocols
18 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.3%
19
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
20
European Journal of Pharmacology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
21
Heart Rhythm
22 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
22
Circulation
66 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
23
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 15%
0.7%
24
Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology
65 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
25
Journal of Translational Medicine
46 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
26
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 18%
0.6%