Back

Survey on emergency care utilization in tertiary care hospitals in Indonesia

Fujisawa, M.; Fukaguchi, K.; Tokita, A.; Iwamoto, Y.; Takeda, T.; Condro, L.; Tobing, M.; Prabowo, B.; Qodri, R. R.; Goto, T.

2024-01-18 emergency medicine
10.1101/2024.01.18.24301470 medRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectiveIndonesias emergency care system remains suboptimal despite rising demand due to socio-economic changes and increased life expectancy. This study aims to examine patient and family perceptions of the current emergency care system, identify potential needs, and provide a foundation for its development and improvement. MethodsThis cross-sectional study used an online survey at two Indonesian hospitals in 2022 to target adult emergency department patients or their families. Each participants demographic data, patient journey details, and potential additional medical services were analyzed using descriptive statistics. ResultsThe study included 446 participants, primarily family members of patients (93.7%), with a median age of 37 (IQR: 28 to 43{square}years). The majority of patients visited the hospital using private cars (36.9%) and taxis (17.2%), with marked variation between the two hospitals. Only 9.4% of participants were aware of Public Safety Center (PSC) services, and the majority (58.9%) did not use them because they did not know how to contact PSC. The most common waiting time was up to 20 minutes at two tertiary care hospitals. Additional services desired by participants included doctor reservation systems, medical interview applications, and home visitation services. Reported problems included long waiting times and crowded emergency rooms. ConclusionsThe study highlights transportation disparities and the demand for supplemental services to better emergency department experiences. For optimizing PSC utilization and future resource distribution, it is vital to further investigate patient behaviors and needs during emergency department visits.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.