Sleep moderates the effects of exercise on cognition in chronic stroke: secondary analysis of a randomized trial
Falck, R. S.; Stein, R. G.; Davis, J. C.; Eng, J. J.; Middleton, L. E.; Hall, P. A.; Liu-Ambrose, T.
Show abstract
BackgroundExercise (EX) or cognitive and social enrichment (ENRICH) are two promising strategies for promoting cognitive function post-stroke. Sleep may moderate the effects of these interventions on cogntion, whereby intervention effects may be more robust among individuals suffering from poor sleep. We examined whether sleep moderates the effects of EX or ENRICH on cognitive function in adults with chronic stroke. MethodsSecondary analysis of a three-arm parallel, single-blinded, randomized clinical trial among community-dwelling adults aged 55+ years with chronic stroke (i.e., [≥]12 months since stroke). Participants were randomized to 2x/week EX, ENRICH, or balance and tone control (BAT). At baseline, device-measured sleep duration and efficiency were measured using MotionWatch8 wrist-worn actigraphy; self-reported quality was measured by Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI). Participants were categorized at baseline as having good or poor: 1) device-measured duration; 2) device-measured efficiency; or 3) self-reported quality. The primary cognitive outcome was Alzheimers Disease Assessment Scale Plus (ADAS-Cog-Plus) measured at baseline, 6 months (end of intervention), and 12 months (6-month follow-up). Linear mixed models examined if baseline sleep categorizations (i.e., good/poor) moderated the effects of EX or ENRICH on ADAS-Cog-Plus. ResultsWe enrolled 120 participants in the trial (EX=34; ENRICH=34; BAT=52). Baseline sleep categorization did not moderate the effect of ENRICH on ADAS-Cog-Plus; however, it moderated the effect of EX. EX participants with poor baseline sleep efficiency (estimated mean difference: -0.48; 95% CI:[-0.85, -0.10]; p=0.010) or self-reported sleep quality (estimated mean difference: -0.38; 95% CI:[-0.70, -0.07]; p=0.014) had significantly better ADAS-Cog-Plus performance at 6 months compared with BAT participants with poor sleep. There was no effect of EX on ADAS-Cog-Plus for participants with good baseline sleep. ConclusionThe effects of EX on cognitive function in adults with chronic stroke is moderated by sleep, whereby poor sleepers benefit more.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Quantifying Exercise Intensity to Predict Changes in Walking Capacity in People with Chronic Stroke 89%
- Time To Navigate (TTN): A practical objective clinical measure for freezing of gait severity in people with Parkinson’s disease 89%
- Using remotely delivered Spring Forest Qigong™ to reduce neuropathic pain in adults with spinal cord injury: A non-randomized controlled trial 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Day-to-Day Sleep Efficiency and Driving Behaviors in Older Adults with and without Cognitive Impairment 95%
- Investigating the relationship between sleep disturbances and white matter hyperintensities in older adults on the Alzheimer’s disease spectrum 90%
- Lower Odor Identification in Subjective Cognitive Decline: A Meta-analysis 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- An Interpretable Machine Learning Tool for In-Home Screening of Agitation Episodes in People Living with Dementia 90%
- Seizure likelihood varies with day-to-day variations in sleep duration in patients with refractory focal epilepsy: A longitudinal EEG investigation 89%
- Rehabilitation needs and mortality associated with the Covid-19 pandemic: a population-based study of all hospitalised and home-healthcare individuals in a Swedish healthcare region 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Preliminary outcomes of combined treadmill and overground high-intensity interval training in ambulatory chronic stroke 91%
- A randomized sham-controlled trial of transcranial and intranasal photobiomodulation in Japanese patients with mild cognitive impairment and mild dementia due to Alzhimer’s disease: a protocol 91%
- Sleep Duration and the Risk of Metabolic Syndrome: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.