Is there a difference in the satisfaction levels between professionals who have participated and those who have not participated in the TeleUTIP telemedicine project regarding their engagement in tele-education activities?
Rodrigues Moleda Constant, H. M.; Jacovas, V. C.; Vinade Chagas, M. E.; Cotta Matte, M. C.; Konig Klever, E.; Gomes da Cunha, L.; Mafalda Krauzer, J. R.; de Campos Moreira, T.; Cabral, F. C.
Show abstract
ObjectiveThe aim of this study is to introduce a distance education program and assess the satisfaction of health professionals. MethodsA cross-sectional study was conducted in five public hospitals across different regions of Brazil. A total of 171 health professionals participated in a tele-education activity involving discussions of complex cases in a Case-Based Learning (CBL) format. Employee satisfaction was measured using the translated questionnaire Tele-Education Satisfaction Assessment Instrument (IAS-TE). ResultsThe mean satisfaction score for participants was 4.6 on a 5-point Likert-type scale. Participants engaged in the telemedicine project (35.5%) reported significantly higher satisfaction (p<0.001) compared to their non-participating peers (n = 149, 64.5%). The IAS-TE exhibited a Cronbachs alpha of 0.73, indicating good reliability, and demonstrated good homogeneity (KMO = 0.76, Bartletts test of sphericity = p<0.00). ConclusionParticipants in the proposed activity expressed high levels of satisfaction. The findings suggest that satisfaction levels are elevated among professionals involved in the telemedicine project. The proposed satisfaction assessment instrument (IAS-TE) exhibits robust psychometric qualities and is suitable for evaluating other distance education activities. Future perspectives involve gaining a deeper understanding of strategies to enhance satisfaction for professionals who do not engage in activities using advanced technology.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluating user experience with immersive technology in simulation-based education: a modified Delphi study with qualitative analysis 96%
- Introducing the 4Ps Model of Transitioning to Distance Learning: a convergent mixed methods study conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic 95%
- REPLICCAR II Study: Data Quality Audit in the Paulista Cardiovascular Surgery Registry 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Key factors for effective implementation of healthcare workers support interventions in health organisations after patient safety incidents: a protocol for a scoping review 94%
- Relationship Between Adverse Events Prevalence, Patient Safety Culture And Patient Safety Perception In A Single Sample Of Patients: A Cross-Sectional And Correlational Study 94%
- The preparedness and response to COVID-19 in a quaternary Intensive Care Unit in Australia: perspectives and insights from frontline critical care clinicians 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Effect of introducing interprofessional education concepts on students of various healthcare disciplines in the United Arab Emirates 96%
- Large language models for generating medical examinations: systematic review 95%
- Improving capacity for advanced training in obstetric surgery: Evaluation of a blended learning approach 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluation of the performance of GPT-3.5 and GPT-4 on the Medical Final Examination 92%
- A multipurpose machine learning approach to predict COVID-19 negative prognosis in Sao Paulo, Brazil 92%
- Researcher and Clinician Preferences for a Journal Transparency Tool: A Mixed-Methods Survey and Focus Group Study 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Performance of ChatGPT in pediatric audiology as rated by students and experts 94%
- Effect of Virtually Led Value-Based Preoperative Assessment on Safety, Efficiency, and Patient and Professional Satisfaction 93%
- Assessing Attitudes and Perceptions of High-risk, Low-resource Communities towards Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Public-access Defibrillation 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.