Understanding Low Vaccine Uptake in African, Caribbean, and Black Populations Relative to Public Health in High-Income Countries: A Scoping Review Protocol
Etowa, J.; Beauchamp, S.; Cole, V.
Show abstract
BackgroundVaccination has significantly contributed to reducing once common and even deadly infectious diseases, yet vaccine hesitancy threatens the emergence of vaccine-preventable diseases. The COVID-19 pandemic has caused the need for the largest mass vaccination campaign ever undertaken to date; however, African, Caribbean, and Black (ACB) populations have shown both a disproportionately high degree of negative impacts from the pandemic and the lowest willingness to become vaccinated. Low vaccination rates in this vulnerable population are a pinnacle concern in public health, as low vaccination rates in ACB communities may both be the result of health inequities, as well as further exacerbate them. PurposeTo explore low vaccine uptake in African, Caribbean, and Black (ACB) populations relative to public health in high-income countries. Objectives 1) To identify concepts and boundaries of existing evidence sources on low vaccine uptake in ACB populations; 2) To map out the evidence on the concepts and boundaries and to identify gaps in the research; and 3) To determine existing interventions to improve low vaccine uptake in the study population. MethodologyThis scoping review follows the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) framework for scoping reviews, supplemented by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews extension (PRISMA-ScR). Any deviations from the JBI recommendations are stated. Theoretical underpinnings of the intersectionality approach will be used to help interpret the complexities of health inequities in the ACB population, including those related to the social determinants of health (SDOH). Search strategies were developed by an information specialist (VC) and peer- reviewed using the PRESS guideline. The search was conducted in: MEDLINE(R) ALL (OvidSP), Embase (OvidSP), CINAHL (EBSCOHost), APA PsycInfo (OvidSP), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (OvidSP), Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (OvidSP), Allied & Complimentary Medicine Database (Ovid SP), and Web of Science. Eligibility criteria are based on the Population, Concept, Context (PCC) framework. The inclusion criteria for this study included evidence -sources with a primary focus on African, Caribbean, and Black populations, and other related terms; high-income countries as defined by the World Bank where ACB populations are considered a minority; all service providers; English and French languages; all types of evidence sources; related to low vaccine uptake and alternative terms; all vaccines; and publications from 2020- current (July 19th, 2022). The screening, selection, and extraction of the evidence sources were completed by the AVA research team. Analysis was done through the process of Thematic Mapping, and summarization and presentation of the findings were done through a narrative description organized using the socioeconomic model (SEM) as a framework. Ethics and disseminationThis study used published evidence sources with no human or animal participants; thus, ethical approval and consent to participate are not applicable. DisseminationThis will occur through peer-reviewed open-access journals and conferences that target stakeholders in public health, vaccination campaigns and overcoming inequities in healthcare.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy among Marginalized Populations in the U.S. and Canada: Protocol for a Scoping Review 98%
- Implementation strategies to increase human papillomavirus vaccination uptake for adolescent girls in sub-Saharan Africa: A scoping review protocol 96%
- Predictors of COVID-19 Vaccine Acceptability Among Refugees and Other Migrant Populations: A Systematic Scoping Review 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy worldwide: a systematic review of vaccine acceptance rates 97%
- Estimating vaccine confidence levels among healthcare staff and students of a tertiary institution in South Africa 97%
- Community-based Case Studies of Vaccine Hesitancy and the COVID-19 Response in South Africa; The VaxScenes Study 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Parental attitudes towards mandatory vaccination; a systematic review 97%
- What is the quality of evidence informing vaccine clinical practice recommendations in Australia? 95%
- COVID-19 vaccine uptake among healthcare workers in the fourth country to authorize BNT162b2 during the first month of rollout 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- When do persuasive messages on vaccine safety steer COVID-19 vaccine acceptance and recommendations? Behavioral insights from a randomised controlled experiment in Malaysia 96%
- Use of Interviewer-Administered Telephone Surveys during Infectious Disease Outbreaks, Epidemics, and Pandemics: A Scoping Review 94%
- Addressing disruptions in childhood routine immunisation services during the COVID-19 pandemic: perspectives and lessons learned from Liberia, Nepal, and Senegal 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.