A user-friendly input-output (IO) curve analysis tool for variable brain stimulation responses, particularly evoked potentials in transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS)
Ma, K.; Goetz, S. M.
Show abstract
BackgroundMotor-evoked potentials (MEPs) are among the few readily observable direct responses to suprathreshold stimuli administered to the brain. They serve for a variety of applications, often in the form of dose-response curves, also called recruitment or input-output (IO) curves. However, MEPs and thus IO curves demonstrate extreme trial-to-trial variability that can exceed more than two decimal orders of magnitude. Recent studies have identified issues in previous statistical analysis of IO curves and introduced better methods, others could quantitatively separate several widely independent variability sources. However, research has failed providing the field with a user-friendly implementation of the methods for analysing such IO curves statistically sound and separating variability so that they were limited to a few research groups. ObjectiveThis work intends to provide the latest methods for analysing IO curves and extract variability information in an open-source package so that the community can easily use and adapt them to their own needs. MethodsWe implemented recent IO curve methods with a graphical user interface and provided the code as well as compiled versions for Mac, Linux, and Windows. ResultsThe application imports typical IO data of individual stimulus-response sets, guides users step by step through the analysis, and allows exporting of the results including figures for post-hoc analysis and documentation. ConclusionThis graphical application offers a user-friendly environment for analysing the variability of evoked potentials and its various contributions, catering to the needs of clinical and experimental neuroscientists.
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Three Novel Methods for Determining Motor Threshold with Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Outperform Conventional Procedures 96%
- Statistical Characterization of Cortical-Thalamic Dynamics Evoked by Cortical Stimulation in Mice 96%
- Bayesian optimization of cortical neuroprosthetic vision using perceptual feedback 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Optimal sigmoid function models for analysis of transspinal evoked potential recruitment curves recorded from different muscles 96%
- Impact of galvanic vestibular stimulation electrode current density on brain current flow patterns: Does electrode size matter? 94%
- Filter bank common spatial pattern and envelope-based features in multimodal EEG-fTCD brain-computer interfaces 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Key Factors in the Cortical Response to Transcranial Electrical Stimulations--A Multi-Scale Modeling Study 94%
- A Leadfield-Free Optimization Framework for Transcranially Applied Electric Currents 93%
- Mu and beta power effects of fast response trait double dissociate during precue and movement execution in the sensorimotor cortex 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- 'RMT-Finder': an automated procedure to determine the Resting Motor Threshold for Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation 94%
- The rt-TEP tool: real-time visualization of TMS-Evoked Potential to maximize cortical activation and minimize artifacts 94%
- Time series analysis of trial-to-trial variability of MEG power spectrum during rest state, unattented listening and frequency-modulated tones classification 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Identifying the engagement of a brain network during a targeted tDCS-fMRI experiment using a machine learning approach 94%
- Selection of stimulus parameters for enhancing slow wave sleep events with a Neural-field theory thalamocortical computational model 93%
- Predicting the effects of deep brain stimulation using a reduced coupled oscillator model 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.