Back

Anti-CD20 antibodies in relapsing multiple sclerosis: Protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis

Navarro, C. E.; Cardenas-Robledo, S.; Macea, J.; Ortiz-Cano, N. A.; Florez, I. D.

2024-01-15 neurology
10.1101/2024.01.12.24301256 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundMultiple sclerosis is a chronic disease of the central nervous system characterized by autoimmune demyelination. Various immunomodulatory medications are available for its treatment, among which anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies have demonstrated superior efficacy compared to other disease-modifying therapies. However, there is a lack of direct comparison between the four available anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies. Therefore, this study aims to systematically assess the relative efficacy and safety of anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies for treating relapsing multiple sclerosis. Materials and MethodsWe will conduct a systematic review of phase IIb and phase III clinical trials of anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies for the treatment of relapsing multiple sclerosis, following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines. A comprehensive review of the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials; MEDLINE; Embase; ClinicalTrials; International Clinical Trials Registry Platform; OpenGray; and MedRxiv will be performed. Two independent reviewers will select titles, abstracts, and eligible full texts to execute the data extraction. The risk of bias will be assessed with the Cochrane RoB 2 tool. Data on pre-specified outcomes will be analyzed for the selected articles using a random-effects network meta-analysis with a frequentist framework. Summary statistics, along with 95% confidence intervals will be presented, and the effectiveness and safety of each intervention will be ranked using the surface under the cumulative ranking curve. A missing data and a sensitivity analysis will be conducted. We will use the GRADE approach to assess the certainty of the direct, indirect, and network estimate for all outcomes. Results and ConclusionThe results will provide evidence of the relative efficacy and safety of anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies for the treatment of relapsing multiple sclerosis. Systematic review registrationPROSPERO registration number CRD42023437996

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
19.1%
2
Multiple Sclerosis Journal
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.7%
3
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
8.6%
4
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 24%
7.0%
5
Journal of the Neurological Sciences
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.5%
50% of probability mass above
6
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry
29 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
5.0%
7
BMC Neurology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.7%
8
Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.7%
9
BioMed Research International
25 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
10
Medicine
30 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.1%
11
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.9%
12
Journal of Neurology
26 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
13
Brain Sciences
52 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
14
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 56%
1.7%
15
Journal of Advanced Research
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.0%
16
Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology
29 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.0%
17
European Journal of Neurology
20 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.0%
18
International Journal of Cardiology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
19
Life Sciences
25 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
20
Brain, Behavior, and Immunity
105 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
21
Clinical Immunology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
22
Frontiers in Immunology
586 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
23
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
24
Brain and Behavior
37 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
25
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 19%
0.5%
26
Neurology
44 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
27
Journal of Psychosomatic Research
11 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.5%