Back

Germline HLA-DQ genotype influences response to CAR T-cell therapy in patients with large B-cell lymphoma

Le Mene, M.; Allain, V.; Villemonteix, J.; Cuffel, A. A.; Taupin, J.-L.; di Blasi, R.; Thieblemont, C.; Caillat-Zucman, S.

2024-01-12 allergy and immunology
10.1101/2024.01.11.24301087 medRxiv
Show abstract

CD19-directed chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells have greatly improved the prognosis of relapsed/refractory large B-cell lymphoma (rrLBCL), yet treatment failure occurs in more than half of patients, usually in the first 3 months after treatment. While they primarily act through CAR-dependent, HLA-independent recognition of tumor targets, CAR-T cells may also indirectly contribute to long-term tumor immunosurveillance by stimulating endogenous immunity. We hypothesized that HLA diversity, measured by the HLA evolutionary divergence (HED) metric which reflects the breadth of the immunopeptidome presented to host T cells, could influence antitumor response after CAR T-cell therapy, as seen after immune chekpoint inhibitor treatment. We studied 127 rrLBCL patients treated with commercial CAR-T cells in our center, of whom 50 % achieved durable response. We observed no impact of diversity at any HLA locus, except for HED-DQA1 that was surprisingly negatively associated with response. Analysis of the distribution of HLA-DQ alleles according to clustering of HED values pointed to the DQ1/DQ1 genotype as an independent predictor of durable response and lower incidence of relapse/progression. These findings highlight the unsuspected role of germline HLA-DQ molecules in the response to CAR-T cells and suggest an important contribution of cross-talk between CAR-T cells and endogenous immune cells. Key PointsO_LIGermline HLA-DQ genotype is an independent predictor of durable response and lower incidence of relapse/progression after CAR T-cell therapy in rrLBCL C_LIO_LIHLA-DQ1/DQ1 genotype could influence the host immune response after CAR T-cell therapy and increase the chances of a durable response C_LI

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer
64 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.9%
2
Blood Advances
54 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.6%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 21%
8.6%
4
Frontiers in Immunology
586 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
7.1%
5
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.6%
6
Genes & Immunity
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.2%
7
British Journal of Haematology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.0%
8
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 42%
2.9%
50% of probability mass above
9
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 33%
2.5%
10
Frontiers in Oncology
95 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
11
Blood
67 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.9%
12
Immunology
29 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.9%
13
Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.8%
14
Blood Cancer Journal
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.8%
15
Pharmaceuticals
33 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.8%
16
Biology
43 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
17
Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine
18 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.6%
18
OncoImmunology
22 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.6%
19
Medicine
30 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.4%
20
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.2%
21
Communications Medicine
85 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
22
BMC Cancer
52 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
23
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
24
Cancer Medicine
24 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
25
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
88 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
26
Leukemia
39 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
27
Gut
36 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
28
Life Science Alliance
263 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
29
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 65%
0.7%
30
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.5%