Back

Germline HLA-DQ genotype influences response to CAR T-cell therapy in patients with large B-cell lymphoma

Le Mene, M.; Allain, V.; Villemonteix, J.; Cuffel, A. A.; Taupin, J.-L.; di Blasi, R.; Thieblemont, C.; Caillat-Zucman, S.

2024-01-12 allergy and immunology
10.1101/2024.01.11.24301087
Show abstract

CD19-directed chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells have greatly improved the prognosis of relapsed/refractory large B-cell lymphoma (rrLBCL), yet treatment failure occurs in more than half of patients, usually in the first 3 months after treatment. While they primarily act through CAR-dependent, HLA-independent recognition of tumor targets, CAR-T cells may also indirectly contribute to long-term tumor immunosurveillance by stimulating endogenous immunity. We hypothesized that HLA diversity, measured by the HLA evolutionary divergence (HED) metric which reflects the breadth of the immunopeptidome presented to host T cells, could influence antitumor response after CAR T-cell therapy, as seen after immune chekpoint inhibitor treatment. We studied 127 rrLBCL patients treated with commercial CAR-T cells in our center, of whom 50 % achieved durable response. We observed no impact of diversity at any HLA locus, except for HED-DQA1 that was surprisingly negatively associated with response. Analysis of the distribution of HLA-DQ alleles according to clustering of HED values pointed to the DQ1/DQ1 genotype as an independent predictor of durable response and lower incidence of relapse/progression. These findings highlight the unsuspected role of germline HLA-DQ molecules in the response to CAR-T cells and suggest an important contribution of cross-talk between CAR-T cells and endogenous immune cells. Key PointsO_LIGermline HLA-DQ genotype is an independent predictor of durable response and lower incidence of relapse/progression after CAR T-cell therapy in rrLBCL C_LIO_LIHLA-DQ1/DQ1 genotype could influence the host immune response after CAR T-cell therapy and increase the chances of a durable response C_LI

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
eLife
based on 262 papers
Top 0.6%
11.7%
2
Journal of Clinical Immunology
based on 11 papers
Top 0.1%
7.9%
3
Allergy
based on 13 papers
Top 0.2%
7.9%
4
Frontiers in Immunology
based on 140 papers
Top 1%
6.7%
5
PLOS ONE
based on 1737 papers
Top 69%
4.9%
6
The Journal of Immunology
based on 19 papers
Top 0.4%
3.1%
7
Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer
based on 14 papers
Top 0.6%
3.1%
8
Journal of Experimental Medicine
based on 10 papers
Top 0.2%
3.1%
9
Nature Communications
based on 483 papers
Top 21%
2.9%
50% of probability mass above
10
Clinical Immunology
based on 12 papers
Top 0.4%
2.6%
11
Blood
based on 14 papers
Top 0.5%
2.4%
12
Communications Biology
based on 36 papers
Top 1%
1.9%
13
Vaccines
based on 131 papers
Top 3%
1.6%
14
Nature Immunology
based on 14 papers
Top 0.7%
1.6%
15
Science Immunology
based on 15 papers
Top 0.6%
1.6%
16
Cell Reports Medicine
based on 49 papers
Top 3%
1.4%
17
Journal of Clinical Investigation
based on 50 papers
Top 2%
1.4%
18
npj Vaccines
based on 18 papers
Top 0.4%
1.4%
19
Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
based on 15 papers
Top 1%
1.4%
20
Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases
based on 23 papers
Top 0.9%
1.4%
21
Journal of Medical Virology
based on 95 papers
Top 6%
1.4%
22
Scientific Reports
based on 701 papers
Top 79%
1.3%
23
Biology
based on 11 papers
Top 1%
0.8%
24
Cells
based on 14 papers
Top 1%
0.8%
25
Frontiers in Oncology
based on 34 papers
Top 5%
0.8%
26
Immunity
based on 11 papers
Top 0.9%
0.8%
27
JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
based on 13 papers
Top 2%
0.8%
28
Life Science Alliance
based on 11 papers
Top 0.2%
0.8%
29
Communications Medicine
based on 63 papers
Top 3%
0.8%
30
The American Journal of Human Genetics
based on 77 papers
Top 6%
0.8%