Arm movements increase acoustic markers of expiratory flow
Werner, R.; Selen, L.; Pouw, W.
Show abstract
The gesture-speech physics theory suggests that there are biomechanical interactions of the voice with the whole body, driving speech to align fluctuations in loudness and F0 with upper-limb movement. This exploratory study offers a possible falsification of the gesture-speech physics theory, which would predict effects of upper-limb movement on voice as well as respiration. We therefore investigate co-movement expiration. Seventeen participants were asked to produce a continuous exhalation for several seconds. After 3s, they execute one of five within-subject movement conditions with their arm with and without a wrist weight (no movement, elbow flexion, elbow extension, internal arm rotation, external arm rotation). We analyzed the smoothed amplitude envelope of the acoustic signal in relation to arm movement. Compared to no movement, all four movements lead to higher positive peaks in the amplitude peaks, while weight did not influence the amplitude. We also found that across movement conditions, positive amplitude peaks are structurally timed relative to peaks in kine-matics (speed, acceleration). We conclude that the reason why upper-limb movements affect voice loudness is still best understood through gesture-speech physics theory, where upper-limb movements affect the voice directly by modulating sub-glottal pressures. Multimodal prosody is therefore partly literally embodied.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Estimating the time structure of descending activation that generates movements at different speeds 92%
- Sound lateralization Ability is affected by saccade direction but not Eye Movement-Related Eardrum Oscillations (EMREOs) 91%
- Mixed matrix factorization: a novel algorithm for the extraction of kinematic-muscular synergies 91%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Loudness and sound category: Their distinct roles in shaping perceptual and physiological responses to soundscapes 93%
- Individual Differences in Cognition and Perception Predict Neural Processing of Speech in Noise for Audiometrically Normal Listeners. 91%
- No evidence of musical training influencing the cortical contribution to the speech-FFR and its modulation through selective attention 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.