Back

Relationship between Physical Activity and Self-esteem of High School Students: Cross-sectional Study

Alparslan, Z.; Ozer, O.; Arslan, E. N.; Aktas, I. I.; Susuz, I. E.; Ozaydin, A. N.

2024-01-04 public and global health
10.1101/2024.01.03.23300489 medRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectiveThis study aimed to investigate the relationship between physical activity and self-esteem of high school students and contribute the literature from a different sociocultural area. MethodsIn this descriptive study, whole population of 10th and 11th grade of Capa Science High School (Istanbul/Turkiye) students are invited to study. Voluntarily participating students were asked to answer the questions written on standard survey paper, under the observation of researchers. Survey papers included sociodemographic answers as well as Short Form of International Physical Activity Questionnaire to evaluate physical activity levels and Rosenberg Self-esteem Scale to evaluate self-esteem. IBM SPSS Statistics (Version 11) were used to analyse data. Level of p<0.05 was accepted as statistical significance. ResultsData of 225 persons were succesfully collected (n=278, 80.93%). 16 persons data was excluded from physical activity related analyses due to incomplete answers. The 71.60% (n=161) of participants were male, 27.60% (n=62) were female and rest (n=2) did not want to express their genders. Males reported higher self-esteem (p=0.002) and higher physical activity (p=0.031) than females. Self-esteem was associated with regular exercise (p=0.034) status and self-evaluted school success (p=0.001). Self-esteem correlated with participants height (p=0.029, r=0.146). Finally, positive correlation between self-esteem and physical activity was found. (p=0.045, r=0.140). ConclusionPhysical activity and self-esteem was correlated with each other in this study. Potential causational relation and underlying mechanisms should be investigated.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.