Back

Detection of Antibodies Against the African Parasite Trypanosoma brucei Using Synthetic glycosylphosphatidylinositol oligosaccharide fragments

Michel, M.; Stijlemans, B.; Michel, D.; Garg, M.; Geissner, A.; Seeberger, P.; Varon Silva, D.

2024-01-01 biochemistry
10.1101/2023.12.31.573764 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Trypanosoma brucei (T. brucei) parasites cause two major infectious diseases in Africa: African trypanosomiasis in humans (HAT) and Nagana in animals. Despite the enormous economic and social impact, vaccines and reliable diagnostic measures are still lacking for these diseases. The main obstacle to developing accurate diagnostic methods and an active vaccine is the parasites ability for antigenic variation and impairment of B cell maturation, which prevents the development of a long-lasting, effective immune response. The antigenic variation is sustained by random gene switching, segmental gene conversion, and altered glycosylation states of solvent-exposed regions of the corresponding variant surface glycoproteins (VSG). These glycoproteins use a glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI) anchor for attachment to the membrane. GPIs of T. brucei have specific branched structures that are further heterogeneously galactosylated. We synthesized a glycan fragment library containing T. brucei GPIs most prominent structural features and performed an epitope mapping using mice and human sera of infected specimens using glycan microarrays. The studies indicate that in contrast to VSG, T. brucei GPIs are recognized by both short-lived IgM and long-lasting IgG, indicating a specific immune response against GPI structures. These findings enable the development of diagnostic tests based on synthetic antigens for reliable diagnosis of human African trypanosomiasis and Nagana.

Matching journals

The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.