Cabergoline as a Preventive Migraine Treatment: An Investigator-Initiated Randomized Controlled Trial
Hjelholt, A. J.; Bach, F. W.; Kasch, H.; Stovring, H.; Jensen, T. S.; Jorgensen, J. O. L.
Show abstract
BackgroundBeneficial effects of dopamine agonist treatment on migraine have been reported but remain to be properly tested. Aimto examine the effect of cabergoline as preventive treatment for migraine. Primary endpointChange in monthly migraine days (MMD). MethodsIn a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled pilot study, 36 adults with episodic and chronic migraine were enrolled. Following a 28-days baseline period, participants received cabergoline 0.5 mg or placebo once weekly for 12 weeks as add-on treatment. An electronic headache diary was completed by the participant, and pertinent headache questionnaires and blood tests were collected at baseline and following the treatment period. The trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05525611). FindingsMean (SD) baseline MMD was 13.6 (4.1) in the cabergoline group and 14.0 (5.3) in the placebo group. In participants with episodic migraine (n= 20), the change in mean MMD (SE) from baseline to the last 28 days of the treatment period was -5.4 (1.3) (cabergoline) as compared to -1.8 (0.9) (placebo) [odds ratio: 0.79 (95% CI 0.65 - 0.95), p=0.014]. In participants with chronic migraine (n=13), the reduction in MMD with cabergoline was not significant (p=0.6). Patients global impression of change significantly improved after cabergoline as compared to placebo in the entire group of participants (p=0.006). The number of participants with episodic migraine achieving [≥] 50% reduction in MMD tended to increase after cabergoline (p=0.07). Seven participants receiving cabergoline and 4 participants receiving placebo experienced adverse effects, none of which were serious. InterpretationsPreventive cabergoline treatment exhibited clinically meaningful improvement in episodic migraine without serious adverse effects. This provides proof-of-concept to justify a sufficiently powered phase 2 trial with different cabergoline dosing regimens as preventive treatment of episodic migraine. FundingThis study has received no external funding.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- An interdisciplinary outpatient therapy program for children and adolescents with headache - real world data 96%
- Major sex differences in migraine prevalence among occupational categories: a cross-sectional study using UK Biobank 94%
- Cold Receptor TRPM8 as a target for Migraine-associated Pain and Affective Comorbidities 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Subjective sleep quality and objective sleep physiology in migraineurs: a meta-analysis 94%
- Enhanced reflexive eye closure is mediated by ipRGC signals and is specific to migraine with visual aura 91%
- Frequency of neurological manifestations in COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 350 studies 85%
Similar papers in this journal
- L-arginine and aged garlic extract for the prevention of migraine: a study protocol for a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase-II trial (LARGE trial) 95%
- Pain Reduction by Inducing Sensory-Motor Adaptation in Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS PRISMA): Protocol for a Double-blind Randomized Controlled Trial 89%
- Audio-Visual Stimulation Therapy for Chronic Neuropathic Pain: A Sham-Controlled Randomized Clinical Trial 88%
Similar papers in this journal
- Safe Non-opioid and Non-barbiturate containing Acute Medication Combinations in Headache: An Exhaustive Approach Based on DrugBank Database 91%
- Matrix and Graphical Representation of the Primary Headache Syndromes in the International Classification of Headache Disorders (ICHD3): A Basis for Automated Diagnosis and Analysis of Criteria. 89%
- Tasimelteon (HETLIOZ(R)) effective in the treatment of Jet Lag Disorder in an 8-hour phase advance; a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial 88%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.