Optimization of neuromuscular blockade protocols in cynomolgus macaques: monitoring, doses and antagonism
Letscher, H.; Lemaitre, J.; Burban, E.; Le Grand, R.; Bruhns, P.; Relouzat, F.; Gouel-Cheron, A.
Show abstract
BackgroundNeuromuscular blocking agents (NMBAs) are a crucial component of anaesthesia and intensive care. NMBAs are a family of molecules defined by their ability to compete with acetylcholine for binding to the acetylcholine receptor at the neuromuscular junction. This functional homology relies on the presence of ammonium groups in all NMBAs that, however, display vastly different chemical structures. Among animal models, non-human primates (NHP) are an essential model for a great diversity of human disease models but remain poorly characterized for the effectiveness of the diverse NMBAs. MethodsSeven healthy male cynomolgus macaques were randomly assigned to this study. Experiments using macaques were approved by the local ethical committee (CEtEA #44). All animals were anaesthetized according to institutional guidelines, with ketamine and medetomidine, allowing IV line placement and tracheal intubation. Anaesthesia was maintained with isofluorane. Either rocuronium bromine or atracurium besylate was evaluated, with reversal with sugammadex. Monitoring was performed with two devices, TOF-Watch(R) and ToFscan(R), measuring the T4/T1 and the T4/Tref ratios, respectively. Nonparametric Mann-Whitney statistical analyses were done when indicated. ResultsNMBA monitoring required adaptation compared to humans, such as stimulus intensity and electrodes placement, to be efficient and valid in Cynomolgus macaques. When administered, both NMBAs induced deep and persistent neuro-muscular blockade at equivalent doses to clinical doses in humans. Rocuronium-induced profound neuromuscular blockade could be reverted using the cyclodextrin sugammadexs reversal agent. We report no adverse effects in these models by clinical observation, blood chemistry, or complete blood count. ConclusionThese results support the use of non-human primate models for neuromuscular blockade monitoring and testing novel NMBA or their reversal agents.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Differences in sensory nerve block between levobupivacaine and bupivacaine at low concentrations in humans and animals 94%
- S-ketamine in patient-controlled analgesia with oxycodone improves analgesia in a dose-dependent manner after major lumbar fusion surgery: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial 94%
- Association between epidural catheter tip malposition and anesthesiologists’ experience after graduation: a cross-sectional study using postoperative CT images 94%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Anesthetic agents affect urodynamic parameters and anesthetic depth at doses necessary to facilitate preclinical testing in felines 94%
- Performance of EasyBreath ® Decathlon Snorkeling mask for Delivering Continuous Positive Airway Pressure 92%
- Sensory and motor electrophysiological mapping of the cerebellum in humans. 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Mid-Regional pro-Adrenomedullin (MR-proADM), C-Reactive Protein (CRP) and Other Biomarkers in the Early Identification of Disease Progression in COVID-19 Patients in the Acute NHS Setting 88%
- Clinical and laboratory characteristics in outpatient diagnosis of COVID-19 in healthcare professionals in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil 87%
- Progression / remission of Coronavirus disease 2019: Data driven recommendations for repeating SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid amplification tests. 86%
Similar papers in this journal
- Passive Microwave Radiometry (MWR) for diagnostics of COVID-19 lung complications in Kyrgyzstan 88%
- Detection, Isolation and Quantification of Myocardial Infarct with Four Different Histological Staining Techniques 88%
- Soluble angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 as a prognostic biomarker for disease progression in patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 88%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.