Using Generative Artificial Intelligence to Classify Primary Progressive Aphasia from Connected Speech
Rezaii, N.; Quimby, M.; Wong, B.; Hochberg, D.; Brickhouse, M.; Touroutoglou, A.; Dickerson, B. C.; Wolff, P.
Show abstract
Neurodegenerative dementia syndromes, such as Primary Progressive Aphasias (PPA), have traditionally been diagnosed based in part on verbal and nonverbal cognitive profiles. Debate continues about whether PPA is best subdivided into three variants and also regarding the most distinctive linguistic features for classifying PPA variants. In this study, we harnessed the capabilities of artificial intelligence (AI) and natural language processing (NLP) to first perform unsupervised classification of concise, connected speech samples from 78 PPA patients. Large Language Models discerned three distinct PPA clusters, with 88.5% agreement with independent clinical diagnoses. Patterns of cortical atrophy of three data-driven clusters corresponded to the localization in the clinical diagnostic criteria. We then used NLP to identify linguistic features that best dissociate the three PPA variants. Seventeen features emerged as most valuable for this purpose, including the observation that separating verbs into high and low-frequency types significantly improves classification accuracy. Using these linguistic features derived from the analysis of brief connected speech samples, we developed a classifier that achieved 97.9% accuracy in predicting PPA subtypes and healthy controls. Our findings provide pivotal insights for refining early-stage dementia diagnosis, deepening our understanding of the characteristics of these neurodegenerative phenotypes and the neurobiology of language processing, and enhancing diagnostic evaluation accuracy. One sentence summaryComputational linguistic analyses of naturalistic speech samples can classify the aphasic variant of patients similarly to expert clinicians and identify well-established and novel linguistic features crucial for classification.
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Modality-specific dysfunctional neural processing of social-abstract and non-social-concrete information in schizophrenia 93%
- Estimated connectivity networks outperform observed connectivity networks when classifying people with multiple sclerosis into disability groups 91%
- Event-Related Potential Markers of Subjective Cognitive Decline and Mild Cognitive Impairment during a sustained visuo-attentive task 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- A unified neurocomputational bilateral model of spoken language production in healthy participants and recovery in post-stroke aphasia 93%
- Neural Tracking Measures of Speech Intelligibility: Manipulating Intelligibility while Keeping Acoustics Unchanged 92%
- A hierarchy of processing complexity and timescales for natural sounds in human auditory cortex 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Hearing and cognitive decline in aging differentially impact neural tracking of context-supported versus random speech across linguistic timescales 91%
- A multimodal neuroimaging study of brain abnormalities and clinical correlates in post treatment Lyme disease 91%
- A preliminary study to evaluate white matter structural correlates of delayed visuospatial memory and one-week motor skill retention in nondemented older adults 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Lesion site and therapy time predict responses to a therapy for anomia after stroke: a prognostic model development study 92%
- Patients Recovering from COVID-19 who Presented Anosmia During their Acute Episode have Behavioral, Functional, and Structural Brain Alterations 92%
- Auditory beat perception is related to speech output fluency in post-stroke aphasia 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.