Back

In-hospital Outcomes of Ischemic Stroke in Atrial Fibrillation Patients on Anticoagulation: A Retrospective Analysis

Vasquez, M. A.; Lambrakos, L. K.; Velasquez, A.; Goldberger, J.; Mitrani, R. D.

2023-12-24 cardiovascular medicine
10.1101/2023.12.21.23300418 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundLong-term anticoagulation (AC) therapy reduces the risk of stroke in patients with Atrial Fibrillation (AF). Data on the impact of AC on in-hospital stroke outcomes is lacking. MethodsThe National Inpatient Sample was used to identify adult inpatients with AF and a primary diagnosis of ischemic stroke between 2016 and 2020. Data was stratified between patients on AC users and nonusers. A multivariate regression model was used to describe the in-hospital outcomes, adjusting for significant comorbidities. ResultsA total of 655,540 patients with AF and a diagnosis of ischemic stroke were included, of which 194,560 (29.7%) were on long-term AC. Patients on AC tended to be younger (mean age, 77 vs 78), had a higher average CHA2DS2VASc score (4.48 vs 4.20), higher rates of hypertension (91% vs 88%), hyperlipidemia (64% vs 59%), and heart failure (34% vs 30%) compared to patients not on long-term AC. Use of AC was associated with decreased in-hospital mortality (aOR [95% CI]: 0.62 [0.60 - 0.63]), decreased stroke severity (mean NIHSS, 8 vs 10), decreased use of tPA (aOR 0.42 [0.41 - 0.43]), mechanical thrombectomy (aOR 0.85 [0.83 - 0.87]), hemorrhagic conversion (aOR 0.69 [0.67 - 0.70]), gastrointestinal bleeding (aOR 0.74 [0.70 - 0.77]), and discharge to skilled nursing facilities (aOR 0.90 [0.89 - 0.91]), compared to patients not on AC (P<0.001 for all comparisons). ConclusionAmong patients with AF admitted with acute ischemic stroke, AC use prior to stroke was associated with decreased in-hospital mortality, decreased stroke severity, decreased discharge to SNF, and fewer stroke-related and bleeding complications.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.