Back

A common druggable signature of oncogenic CMYC, mutant KRAS and mutant p53 reveals functional redundancy and competition of the oncogenes in cancer

Grzes, M.; Jaiswar, A.; Grochowski, M.; Wojtys, W.; Kazmierczak, W.; Olesinski, T.; Lenarcik, M.; Nowak-Niezgoda, M.; Kolos, M.; Canarutto, G.; Piazza, S.; Wisniewski, J. R.; Walerych, D.

2023-12-21 cancer biology
10.1101/2023.12.20.572548 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Major driver oncogenes CMYC, mutant KRAS and mutant TP53 often co-exist and cooperate in promoting human neoplasia. By CRISPR-Cas9-mediated downregulation we determined their proteomics and transcriptomics downstream programs in a panel of cell lines with activated either single or three oncogenes - in cancers of lung, colon and pancreas. This allowed to define and screen the oncogenes common functional program for anti-cancer target candidates, and find protocols which efficiently kill cancer cells and organoids by targeting pathways represented by a signature of three genes: RUVBL1, HSPA9 and XPO1. We found that these genes were controlled by the driver oncoproteins in a redundant or competitive manner, rather than by cooperation. Each oncoprotein individually was able to upregulate the three target genes, while upon oncogene co-expression each target was controlled preferably by a specific oncoprotein which reduced the influence of the others. Mechanistically this redundancy was mediated by parallel routes of the target gene activation - as in the case of mutant KRAS signaling to C-JUN and GLI-2 transcription factors bypassing CMYC, and by competition - as in the case of mutant p53 and CMYC competing for biding to the target promoters. The transcriptomics data from the cell lines and patient samples indicate that the redundancy of the oncogenic programs is a broad phenomenon which may comprise even a majority of the genes dependent on the oncoprotein, as shown for mutant p53 in colon and lung cancer cell lines. Nevertheless, we demonstrate that the redundant oncogene programs harbor targets of efficient anti-cancer drug combinations, bypassing limitations of a direct oncoprotein inhibition.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Molecular Systems Biology
142 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.4%
2
Molecular Oncology
50 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.3%
3
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.8%
4
EMBO Molecular Medicine
85 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.3%
5
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 20%
4.3%
6
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 13%
3.9%
7
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 5%
3.6%
8
Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
100 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
9
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 37%
3.6%
10
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 42%
3.1%
11
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 11%
3.1%
12
Cells
232 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
13
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 49%
2.1%
14
EMBO reports
136 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
15
Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
16
Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Molecular Cell Research
28 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
17
Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences
84 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
18
Cell Death Discovery
51 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.3%
19
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 14%
1.2%
20
Neoplasia
22 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
21
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
218 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.9%
22
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 26%
0.9%
23
Cell Death & Disease
126 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
24
The EMBO Journal
267 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
25
Cell Systems
167 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.7%
26
Developmental Cell
168 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.7%
27
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 46%
0.7%
28
Heliyon
146 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.6%
29
Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
33 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.6%
30
npj Systems Biology and Applications
99 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%