Back

Financial Cost Analysis Associated with a Locomotor Exercise Randomized Controlled Trial in Chronic Stroke

Hazen, E. M.; Bartsch, B. L.; Billinger, S. A.

2023-12-24 rehabilitation medicine and physical therapy
10.1101/2023.12.20.23300342 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundPost-stroke recovery trials pose distinct recruitment and retention challenges, and understanding the financial requirements of conducting randomized controlled trials is crucial to ensure sufficient resources for successful study execution. The purpose of this analysis was to quantify the costs at a single site with a large catchment area of the Moderate-Intensity Exercise Versus High-Intensity Interval Training to Recover Walking Post-Stroke, HIT Stroke Trial. MethodsTo determine cost, study expense reports were gathered and divided into four categories: oversight, recruitment, retention, and outcome assessments. Categories were then further divided into chronological order for initial contact and prescreening, consenting, initial screening, and baseline testing. The 12-week intervention was divided into 4-week blocks: intervention block 1, post 4-week outcome testing, intervention block 2, post 8-week outcome testing, intervention block 3, and post 12-week outcome testing. ResultsTotal direct cost for site execution was $539,768 with cost per participant approximated as $35,984. Oversight costs accounted for 65.8% of the budget at $355,661. To achieve goals related to inclusive participant recruitment ($21,923) and retention ($28,009), our site costs totaled $49,932. Direct study-related costs included screening assessments ($5,905), baseline assessments ($15,028), intervention ($76,952), and outcome assessments ($36,288). ConclusionClinical trials on walking rehabilitation and exercise, especially those involving multiple assessment visits, require intensive oversight. This cost analysis provides important and critical insight into the expenses required to successfully execute an exercise-based walking rehabilitation trial in the United States.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.4%
2
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 16%
11.9%
3
Frontiers in Neurology
102 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
7.9%
4
BMJ Open
601 papers in training set
Top 3%
7.3%
5
Trials
29 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
5.5%
50% of probability mass above
6
Disability and Rehabilitation
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.1%
7
Stroke
40 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
5.1%
8
Journal of the American Heart Association
140 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.8%
9
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
36 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.4%
10
Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.4%
11
F1000Research
88 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.2%
12
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 62%
1.3%
13
Healthcare
17 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.3%
14
Journal of Clinical and Translational Science
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
15
PLOS Global Public Health
344 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.0%
16
Pilot and Feasibility Studies
14 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.0%
17
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
31 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
18
Neurology
50 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
19
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
37 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
20
JMIR Research Protocols
21 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
21
Journal of Applied Physiology
32 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.6%