Eco-anxiety among Children and Young People: Systematic Review of Social, Political, and Geographical determinants
Kankawale, S.; Niedzwiedz, C. L.
Show abstract
Eco-anxiety refers to distress arising from environmental degradation, especially concerning climate change, with children and young people (CYP) likely to be particularly susceptible. This systematic review examined social, political, and geographic factors associated with eco-anxiety among CYP. We searched 11 databases, Google Scholar and pre-print servers up to August 2024, and citations to January 2025. Quality was assessed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT). 69 studies (42 quantitative, 16 qualitative, 11 mixed-methods) were included in the narrative synthesis. Most studies used non-probability sampling, limiting generalisability, and were from the Global North. Findings were grouped into three categories of determinants: social (age, gender, media exposure, socioeconomic and educational contexts, intergenerational relations, peer and cultural norms), political (distrust, government inaction, individual views, and participation), and geographic (exposure to environmental hazards, cross-country differences, urban or rural residence). Further study is needed to understand how eco-anxiety develops and varies globally, particularly regarding how social, political and geographic factors intersect, and its impacts on mental health and wellbeing.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Socioecological benefits of academic greenspace for human health, plant, and pollinator diversity: a mixed-method study protocol 94%
- Intentional and unintentional non-adherence to social distancing measures during COVID-19: A mixed-methods analysis 93%
- Does living close to petrochemical complex increase the adverse psychological effects of COVID-19 lockdown? 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Urban pandemic response: survey results describing the experiences from twenty-five cities during the COVID-19 pandemic 92%
- Let’s just ask them. Perspectives on urban dwelling and air quality: a cross-sectional survey of 3,222 children, young people and parents 92%
- Who participates in ‘participatory design’ of WASH infrastructure: a mixed-methods process evaluation 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- “Climate change and health?”: Knowledge and perceptions among key stakeholders in Puducherry, India 96%
- The experience of distress during the COVID-19 outbreak: a cross-country examination on the fear of COVID-19 and the sense of loneliness 93%
- Experience of the COVID-19 pandemic in rural Odisha, India: knowledge, preventative actions, and impacts on daily life 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Acceptability and feasibility of strategies to shield the vulnerable during the COVID-19 outbreak: a qualitative study in six Sudanese communities 92%
- Household Hardships during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Examining Household Vulnerability and Responses to Pandemic Related Shocks in Eastern Ethiopia 91%
- A comparative national-level analysis of government food system resilience activities in preparation for future food system disruptions 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Relationship between COVID-19 pandemic and ecological, economic, and social characteristics 93%
- How does public knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors correlate in relation to COVID-19? A community-based cross-sectional study in Nepal 90%
- SARS-CoV-2 B.1.1.7 lineage-related perceptions, COVID-19 vaccine acceptance and travel worry among healthcare workers 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.