Prevalence of orthostatic intolerance in Long Covid clinic patients - A multicentre observational study
Lee, C.; Greenwood, D.; Master, H.; Balasundaram, K.; Williams, P.; Scott, J.; Wood, C.; Cooper, R.; Darbyshire, J.; Espinosa Gonzalez, A.; Davies, H.; Osborne, T.; Corrado, J.; Iftekhar, N.; Rogers, N.; Delaney, B. C.; Greenhalgh, T.; Sivan, M.; LOCOMOTION Consortium,
Show abstract
PurposeOrthostatic intolerance (OI), including postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (PoTS) and orthostatic hypotension (OH), are often reported in long covid, but published studies are small with inconsistent results. We sought to estimate the prevalence of objective OI in patients attending long covid clinics and healthy volunteers and associations with symptoms and comorbidities. MethodsParticipants were recruited from 8 UK long covid clinics, and healthy volunteers from general population. All undertook standardised National Aeronautics and Space Administration Lean Test (NLT). Participants history of typical OI symptoms (e.g. dizziness, palpitations) prior to and during the NLT were recorded. Results277 long covid patients and 50 frequency-matched healthy volunteers were tested. Healthy volunteers had no history of OI symptoms or PoTS, 10% had asymptomatic OH. 130 (47%) long covid patients had previous history of OI symptoms and 144 (52%) developed symptoms during the NLT. 41 (15%) had an abnormal NLT, 20 (7%) met criteria for PoTS and 21 (8%) had OH. Of patients with an abnormal NLT, 45% had no prior symptoms of OI. Relaxing the diagnostic thresholds for PoTS from two consecutive to one reading, resulted in 11% of long covid participants meeting criteria for PoTS, but not in healthy volunteers. ConclusionMore than half of long covid patients experienced OI symptoms during NLT and more than one in ten patients met the criteria for either PoTS or OH, half of whom did not report previous typical OI symptoms. We recommend all patients attending long covid clinics are offered an NLT and appropriate management commenced. Trial registration numbers NCT05057260, ISRCTN15022307
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Diagnostic accuracy of the STANDING algorithm in patients with isolated vertigo/dizziness, a multicentre prospective study (STANDING-M) 91%
- Evaluating the impact of a pulse oximetry remote monitoring programme on mortality and healthcare utilisation in patients with covid-19 assessed in Accident and Emergency departments in England: a retrospective matched cohort study 90%
- Accuracy of the National Early Warning Score version 2 (NEWS2) in predicting need for time-critical treatment: Retrospective observational cohort study 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Predictors of adverse outcome in patients with suspected COVID-19 managed in a ‘virtual hospital’ setting: a cohort study 92%
- HEART rate variability biofeedback for LOng Covid symptoms (HEARTLOC): protocol for a feasibility study 92%
- The Basel Long COVID Cohort Study (BALCoS): protocol of a prospective cohort study 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Characterizing Long COVID in an International Cohort: 7 Months of Symptoms and Their Impact 92%
- Rehabilitation needs and mortality associated with the Covid-19 pandemic: a population-based study of all hospitalised and home-healthcare individuals in a Swedish healthcare region 90%
- Symptom Persistence Despite Improvement in Cardiopulmonary Health – Insights from longitudinal CMR, CPET and lung function testing post-COVID-19 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Limited recovery from post-acute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 (PASC) at eight months in a prospective cohort 93%
- Symptoms persisting after hospitalization for COVID-19: 12 months interim results of the COFLOW study 93%
- Early prone positioning does not improve the outcome of patients with mild pneumonia due to SARS-CoV-2: results from an open-label, randomized controlled trial (the EPCoT Study) 89%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.