Back

Evaluation of gastric electrophysiology, symptoms and quality of life after pancreaticoduodenectomy

Wang, T. H.-H.; Varghese, C.; Calder, S.; Gharibans, A.; Schamberg, G.; Bartlett, A.; Srinivasa, S.; OGrady, G.

2023-12-17 surgery
10.1101/2023.12.14.23299984
Show abstract

BackgroundPancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) is an operation performed for several indications, including pancreatic and biliary malignancies. Delayed gastric emptying (DGE) is a common post-operative complication and the underlying pathophysiology remains poorly understood. This study aimed to evaluate the gastric electrophysiology, symptoms and quality of life following PD, using the novel non-invasive Gastric Alimetry System. MethodsPD patients with index operations between 2017-2022 were assessed using the Gastric Alimetry System(R), comprising a stretchable 8x8 electrode array, wearable Reader, and validated symptom logging app. A 30-minute pre-prandial and a 4-hour post-prandial recording was performed. Outcomes included Principal Gastric Frequency, BMI-adjusted amplitude, Gastric Alimetry Rhythm Index, meal response, symptoms, and quality of life (QOL) questionnaires (PAGI-SYM, PAGI-QOL). Data was compared to a validated reference range and matched healthy controls. Results19 patients and 19 matched controls were recruited. There were no differences in any gastric parameters between PD patients and matched controls (all p>0.05). Gastric electrophysiology parameters lay outside normative reference intervals in 8/19 cases, generally being only minor deviations, while significant symptoms occurred in 8/19 (42%); which did not correlate (p=0.43). PD patients had worse quality of life scores than controls (p<0.01), however, no correlations were identified between electrophysiological parameters and QOL. DiscussionModerate to severe upper GI symptoms are common after PD with worse QOL compared to the controls. Gastric electrical activity generally recovers well long-term following PD, indicating that other factors contribute to symptoms. Further studies should now assess acute changes in gastric function after PD.

Matching journals

1
Scientific Reports
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 701 published papers
Top 8%
2.6× avg
2
PLOS ONE
Public Library of Science (PLoS) · based on 1737 published papers
Top 41%
12.5%
3
Neurobiology of Disease
Elsevier BV · based on 12 published papers
#1
173× avg
4
Journal of Clinical Medicine
MDPI AG · based on 77 published papers
Top 1%
11× avg
5
Brain Communications
Oxford University Press (OUP) · based on 79 published papers
Top 2%
14× avg
6
American Journal of Gastroenterology
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) · based on 15 published papers
Top 0.7%
43× avg
7
Frontiers in Medicine
Frontiers Media SA · based on 99 published papers
Top 3%
6.8× avg
8
eLife
eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd · based on 262 published papers
Top 7%
2.9× avg
9
Frontiers in Oncology
Frontiers Media SA · based on 34 published papers
Top 3%
10× avg
10
BMJ Open
BMJ · based on 553 published papers
Top 35%
2.4%
11
npj Digital Medicine
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 85 published papers
Top 7%
3.2× avg
12
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
The Endocrine Society · based on 26 published papers
Top 2%
9.7× avg
13
British Journal of Anaesthesia
Elsevier BV · based on 13 published papers
Top 1.0%
16× avg
14
BMC Neurology
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 11 published papers
Top 0.9%
28× avg
15
BMC Cancer
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 21 published papers
Top 3%
10× avg
16
Biology Methods and Protocols
Oxford University Press (OUP) · based on 19 published papers
Top 0.5%
15× avg
17
Frontiers in Neurology
Frontiers Media SA · based on 74 published papers
Top 8%
2.4× avg
18
Heliyon
Elsevier BV · based on 57 published papers
Top 5%
4.4× avg
19
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 36 published papers
Top 6%
3.3× avg
20
Human Brain Mapping
Wiley · based on 53 published papers
Top 6%
2.5× avg
21
Brain
Oxford University Press (OUP) · based on 69 published papers
Top 8%
1.7× avg
22
eBioMedicine
Elsevier BV · based on 82 published papers
Top 9%
2.7× avg