Back

Comparative analysis of HPV-Human Protein Interaction Networks in Oropharyngeal and Oral Squamous cell carcinomas

Riaz, A.; Khan, F. F.

2023-12-07 cancer biology
10.1101/2023.12.05.570064 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma (OSCC) accounts for more than 90% of reported head and neck cancers which is the sixth leading cancer worldwide. Oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) cases, a closely located but a different sub-type of head and neck cancer, are also rising worldwide specifically among young individuals with risk factors including viral infection, smoking and alcohol. HPV infection specifically the subtype HPV16 is a significant risk factor in the initiation and progression of OPSCC, but has not been reported to play a role in OSCC. This study sets out to decipher mechanistic differences at the molecular level by comparing the viral-human protein-protein interaction (PPI) networks both in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) and oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC). We found that the unbiased HPV16-Human network consisted of 479 nodes, including 7 HPV16 proteins and 472 human proteins. Enrichment analysis revealed significant involvement of the identified human proteins in ubiquitination, protein degradation, and cancer-related pathways. A subset of 37 genes showed differential expression in HPV-positive OPSCC and OSCC, with TP53 over-expressed and ENDOD1 under-expressed in both cancers. Six genes (NUTM1, MYC, SCN9A, COL27A1, ITGB4, and GNB2) exhibited distinct changes in HPV-positive OPSCC compared to the other groups, where NUTM1 was the most over-expressed in OPSCC HPV+. The identified genes and pathways could serve as potential targets for precision medicine and therapeutic interventions in HPV-associated cancers. Further investigations are required to validate their clinical implication in in vitro and in vivo models.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.