Identifying Impacts of Contact Tracing on Epidemiological Inference from Phylogenetic Data
Kupperman, M. D.; Ke, R.; Leitner, T.
Show abstract
Robust sampling methods are foundational to inferences using phylogenies. Yet the impact of using contact tracing, a type of non-uniform sampling used in public health applications such as infectious disease outbreak investigations, has not been investigated in the molecular epidemiology field. To understand how contact tracing influences a recovered phylogeny, we developed a new simulation tool called SEEPS (Sequence Evolution and Epidemiological Process Simulator) that allows for the simulation of contact tracing and the resulting transmission tree, pathogen phylogeny, and corresponding virus genetic sequences. Importantly, SEEPS takes within-host evolution into account when generating pathogen phylogenies and sequences from transmission histories. Using SEEPS, we demonstrate that contact tracing can significantly impact the structure of the resulting tree, as described by popular tree statistics. Contact tracing generates phylogenies that are less balanced than the underlying transmission process, less representative of the larger epidemiological process, and affects the internal/external branch length ratios that characterize specific epidemiological scenarios. We also examined real data from a 2007-2008 Swedish HIV-1 outbreak and the broader 1998-2010 European HIV-1 epidemic to highlight the differences in contact tracing and expected phylogenies. Aided by SEEPS, we show that the data collection of the Swedish outbreak was strongly influenced by contact tracing even after downsampling, while the broader European Union epidemic showed little evidence of universal contact tracing, agreeing with the known epidemiological information about sampling and spread. Overall, our results highlight the importance of including possible non-uniform sampling schemes when examining phylogenetic trees. For that, SEEPS serves as a useful tool to evaluate such impacts, thereby facilitating better phylogenetic inferences of the characteristics of a disease outbreak. SEEPS is available at github.com/MolEvolEpid/SEEPS.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Distinguishing imported cases from locally acquired cases within a geographically limited genomic sample of an infectious disease 96%
- RF-Net 2: Fast Inference of Virus Reassortment and Hybridization Networks 96%
- Optimizing viral genome subsampling by genetic diversity and temporal distribution (TARDiS) for Phylogenetics 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- How does date-rounding affect phylodynamic inference for public health? 96%
- MASCOT-Skyline integrates population and migration dynamics to enhance phylogeographic reconstructions 96%
- A Bayesian inference method to estimate transmission trees with multiple introductions; applied to SARS-CoV-2 in Dutch mink farms. 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Deep learning and likelihood approaches for viral phylogeography converge on the same answers whether the inference model is right or wrong 96%
- Expectation-Maximization enables Phylogenetic Dating under a Categorical Rate Model 95%
- A minimal yet flexible likelihood framework to assess correlated evolution 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.