Obesity Prevention Efforts in France, Italy, and Japan - A Scoping Review Protocol
Hammad, N. M.; Tobias, D. K.
Show abstract
BackgroundPopulation-level prevention efforts in the US have yet to correct the upward trends in increasing US obesity prevalence. Italy, France, and Japan are high-income countries that have employed approaches aimed at obesity prevention that may have contributed to their favorable obesity trends. It is plausible that these efforts could be culturally adapted with similar effectiveness to the US population. This paper outlines the protocol of a scoping review that will identify and characterize the range of obesity prevention efforts implemented in Italy, France, and Japan to inform potential strategies for obesity prevention in the US. Methods and analysisWe will conduct a systematic search in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane. We will assess articles that describe any national, regional, or local public health and/or clinical guideline, recommendation, intervention, campaign, policy or other population-level effort targeting obesity prevention in Italy, France, and Japan. Two independent reviewers will screen the articles, and a third independent reviewer will resolve conflicts that arise upon screening. Descriptive synthesis will be performed to describe the country-specific prevention strategies and summarize the available evidence for their effectiveness. DiscussionThe purpose of this paper is to describe the study protocol for a scoping review that will provide a comprehensive summary of available evidence for obesity prevention strategies that have been implemented in Italy, France, and Japan. These strategies will inform potential prevention efforts for consideration in the US. Scoping review registration DOIhttps://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/M35YX.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Unpacking the behavioural components and delivery features of early childhood obesity prevention interventions in the TOPCHILD Collaboration: a systematic review and intervention coding protocol 95%
- Transforming Obesity Prevention for CHILDren (TOPCHILD) Collaboration: protocol for a systematic review with individual participant data meta-analysis of behavioural interventions for the prevention of early childhood obesity 94%
- A randomised controlled trial of preconception lifestyle intervention on maternal and offspring health in people with increased risk of gestational diabetes: study protocol for the BEFORE THE BEGINNING trial 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Eating Disorders In weight-related Therapy (EDIT): Protocol for a systematic review with individual participant data meta-analysis of eating disorder risk in behavioural weight management 95%
- A feasibility study to test a novel approach to dietary weight loss with a focus on assisting informed decision making in food selection 94%
- Weight-normative messaging predominates on TikTok – a qualitative content analysis 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Trends in weight gain recorded in English primary care before and during the Coronavirus-19 pandemic: an observational cohort study using the OpenSAFELY platform 91%
- Association of puberty timing with Type 2 diabetes: Systematic review and meta-analysis 91%
- Robust causal inference for long-term policy decisions: cost effectiveness of interventions for obesity using Mendelian randomization 90%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- A systematic scoping review of adult obesity policy actions and weight-related services in a region of the United Kingdom using the Behaviour Change Wheel 95%
- Barriers and enablers to obesity prevention in female-only high schools in Riyadh: A qualitative study exploring healthy eating, physical activity and school-based interventions using the COM-B Model 93%
- Life-course social disparities in body mass index trajectories across adulthood: cohort study evidence from China Health and Nutrition Survey 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.