Back

Initial experiences with Mycobacterium tuberculosis DNA extraction for downstream Deeplex Myc-TB targeted deep sequencing in a high burden setting.

Limberis, J. D.; Nalyvayko, A.; Steyn, J.; Williams, J.; Grobbelaar, M.; Warren, R. M.; Metcalfe, J. Z.

2023-11-23 infectious diseases
10.1101/2023.11.22.23296677 medRxiv
Show abstract

The propensity for M. tuberculosis to develop resistance and the lack of clinical tools for the rapid determination of such resistance has long significantly complicated tuberculosis (TB) therapeutics. Targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS) has improved our understanding of the genetic basis and identification of drug-resistant TB. However, to achieve accurate results reliable enough for clinical implementation, high-quality M. tuberculosis DNA must be extracted from patient-derived samples within high burden routine laboratory workflows. In advance of a large cluster RCT in the Western Cape of South Africa evaluating the Deeplex Myc-TB targeted NGS assay (GenoScreen; Lille, France), we sought to compare DNA extraction methods for both early MGIT culture-positive samples and processed patient sputum. Given the lack of reference standard method, we assessed a representative set of DNA extraction protocols, including the GenoScreen-recommended method, in parallel in South Africa and at UC San Francisco. Our findings provide preliminary insights into an optimal DNA extraction method for the utilization of Deeplex Myc-TB in routine laboratory settings and can inform future experiments evaluating newer generation assays.

Matching journals

The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
120 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
54.2%
50% of probability mass above
2
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.5%
3
Emerging Infectious Diseases
103 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.7%
4
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.4%
5
Microbial Genomics
204 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.2%
6
The Lancet Microbe
43 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.7%
7
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 46%
2.5%
8
Microbiology Spectrum
435 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.2%
9
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
134 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.2%
10
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 52%
2.0%
11
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.4%
12
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
98 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
13
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
39 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
14
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
126 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
15
Journal of Infection
71 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
16
Thorax
32 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.7%
17
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.7%
18
mSphere
281 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
19
European Respiratory Journal
54 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
20
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
378 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%
21
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
167 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
22
Tuberculosis
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.5%