Association Between Major Depressive Disorder and the Development of Cerebral Small Vessel Disease: A Mendelian Randomization Study
Lu, T.; Luo, L.; Yang, J.; Li, Y.; Chen, D.; Sun, H.; Liao, H.; Zhao, W.; Ren, Z.; Xu, Y.; Yu, S.; Cheng, X.; Sun, J.
Show abstract
BackgroundAlthough observational studies indicate a complex, bidirectional association between major depressive disorder (MDD) and cerebral small vessel disease (CSVD), the results are frequently inconsistent. This study investigated the potential correlation of MDD with both CSVD clinical outcomes and imaging markers, utilizing a bidirectional Mendelian randomization (MR) study design. MethodsInstrumental variables for both MDD and CSVD were extracted from the latest or most extensive genome-wide association study (GWAS) data available for each phenotype. Clinical outcomes and imaging markers of CSVD were defined using several parameters. The inverse variance weighting (IVW) method with additional sensitivity and heterogeneity analyses was used. Furthermore, a separate GWAS for depression was used to validate our significant findings. ResultsIn the forward MR analyses, the genetically predicted risk of MDD was positively associated with two CSVD phenotypes showing microscopic white matter (WM) damage: mean diffusivity (IVW OR = 2.191, 95 % CI 1.226 to 3.917, p = 0.008) and WM-enlarged perivascular space (OR = 1.053 95 % CI 1.006 to 1.101, p = 0.026). The use of an independent database for depression yielded no significant risk of depression associated with these two CSVD traits. Furthermore, reverse MR analyses showed no evidence of reverse causality between MDD and an altered CSVD risk. ConclusionsThis study utilizing MR imaging findings supports a substantial causal association between MDD and CSVD-related indicators of impaired WM microstructure. It is necessary to exercise caution when extending these results to individuals with depression.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Choroid plexus enlargement is associated with neuroinflammation and reduction of blood brain barrier permeability in depression 96%
- Predicting depression risk in early adolescence via multimodal brain imaging 93%
- Spatial distribution and cognitive impact of cerebrovascular risk-related white matter hyperintensities 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Common And Distinct Patterns Of Task-Related Neural Activation Abnormalities In Patients With Remitted And Current Major Depressive Disorder: A Systematic Review And Coordinate-Based Meta-Analysis 95%
- Common and separable neural alterations in adult and adolescent depression – evidence from neuroimaging meta-analyses 94%
- Structural Brain Correlates of Cognitive Function in Schizophrenia: A Meta-Analysis 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Trait repetitive negative thinking in depression is associated with functional connectivity in negative thinking state rather than resting state 94%
- Neuroimaging Correlates of Emotional Response-Inhibition Discriminate Between Young Depressed Adults With and Without Sub-threshold Bipolar Symptoms 93%
- Polygenic Risk for Depression and Anterior and Posterior Hippocampal Volume in Children and Adolescents 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Cognitive and inflammatory heterogeneity in severe mental illness: Translating findings from blood to brain 93%
- Dysconnectivity of a brain functional network was associated with blood inflammatory markers in depression 93%
- Dissecting depression symptoms: multi-omics clustering uncovers immune-related subgroups and cell-type specific dysregulation 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Higher amplitudes of visual networks are associated with trait but not state- depression. 94%
- Effective connectivity during faces processing in major depression – distinguishing markers of pathology, risk, and resilience 94%
- No Relationship between Male Pubertal Timing and Depression – New Insights from Epidemiology and Mendelian Randomization 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.