Exploring the possibility of collaboration for biomedical professionals and traditional healers: A Systematic Review
Ilozumba, O.; Koirala, S.; Meka, A.; Ossai, E.; Choudhury, S.; Wagner, R.; Lilford, R. J.
Show abstract
IntroductionTraditional healers play a crucial role in healthcare provision, particularly in low- and middle-income countries. Thus, there is a global interest in understanding the possibilities for collaboration between traditional healers and biomedical professionals. We believe there is the need for a comprehensive review on collaboration between traditional healers and biomedical professionals. Therefore, the aim of this review is to synthesise the literature on collaboration between traditional healers and biomedical professional including relevant interventions. MethodsA systematic review was conducted, utilizing a search strategy in PubMed, Web of Science, SCOPUS, and Google Scholar. Articles addressing collaboration between traditional healers and biomedical professionals were included, with a focus on attitudes, perceptions, interventions, and collaborative models. Data extraction followed a predefined template and the DAmour et al. framework was employed for analysis. ResultsThe review identified 29 relevant articles, predominantly conducted in Africa. The majority of studies (n=22) explored attitudes and perceptions, revealing a willingness among traditional healers to collaborate, while biomedical professionals exhibited mixed feelings. Seven studies focused on interventions aimed at fostering collaboration primarily focused on improving referral systems and educational initiatives. These studies found positive outcomes. Examining collaboration through the lens of DAmour et al.s framework revealed that trust was a significant barrier to collaboration. ConclusionThis review highlights a willingness to collaborate amongst of traditional healers and biomedical professionals and provides some successful examples of working across systems. It also reveals areas for attention in developing collaborative models of working.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Experiences of Indigenous peoples living with pelvic health conditions: A scoping review 95%
- Traditional treatment of HIV and the role of family members as barriers to access to HIV care service or antiretroviral therapy among people living with HIV 94%
- Process of Use of Evidence Products by Frontline Maternal, Newborn and Child Health Staff at the Facility Level in Ghana. 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Perspectives on health, illness, disease and management approaches among traditional health care spiritualists in Central Uganda 96%
- Factors affecting trust in clinical trials conduct: Views of stakeholders from a qualitative study in Ghana 95%
- An exploratory study on becoming a traditional spiritual healer among Baganda in Central Uganda 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Use of Interviewer-Administered Telephone Surveys during Infectious Disease Outbreaks, Epidemics, and Pandemics: A Scoping Review 93%
- Spiritual and religious aspects influence mental health and viral load: A quantitative study among young people living with HIV in Zimbabwe 93%
- Designathons in Health Research: A Global Systematic Review 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- International Prevalence Of Consultation With A Naturopathic Practitioner: A Systematic Review And Meta-Analysis 95%
- Participatory research in health intervention studies involving migrants: a systematic review 94%
- Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on Black, Asian and Minority Ethnic (BAME) communities: a qualitative study on the perspectives of BAME community leaders 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.