Back

Associations between polygenic risk score and COVID-19 severity in Russian population using low-pass genome sequencing

Nostaeva, A.; Shimansky, V.; Apalko, S.; Kuznetsov, I.; Sushentseva, N.; Popov, O.; Aulchenko, Y.; Shcherbak, S.

2023-11-20 genetic and genomic medicine
10.1101/2023.11.20.23298335
Show abstract

The course of COVID-19 is characterized by wide variability, with genetics playing a contributing role. Through large-scale genetic association studies, a significant link between genetic variants and disease severity was established. However, individual genetic variants identified thus far have shown modest effects, indicating a polygenic nature of this trait. To address this, a polygenic risk score (PRS) can be employed to aggregate the effects of multiple single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) into a single number, allowing practical application to individuals within a population. In this work, we investigated the performance of a PRS model in the context of COVID-19 severity in 1,085 Russian participants using low-coverage NGS sequencing. By developing a genome-wide PRS model based on summary statistics from the COVID-19 Host Genetics Initiative consortium, we demonstrated that the PRS, which incorporates information from over a million common genetic variants, can effectively identify individuals at significantly higher risk for severe COVID-19. The findings revealed that individuals in the top 10% of the PRS distribution had a markedly elevated risk of severe COVID-19, with an odds ratio (OR) of 2.1 (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.4-3.2, p-value = 0.00046). Furthermore, incorporating the PRS into the prediction model significantly improved its accuracy compared to a model that solely relied on demographic information (p-value < 0.0001). This study highlights the potential of PRS as a valuable tool for identifying individuals at increased risk of severe COVID-19 based on their genetic profile.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Scientific Reports
based on 701 papers
Top 2%
17.7%
2
Genome Medicine
based on 56 papers
Top 1%
6.7%
3
Nature Communications
based on 483 papers
Top 14%
5.5%
4
Nature Genetics
based on 72 papers
Top 3%
4.9%
5
PLOS Genetics
based on 39 papers
Top 0.4%
4.7%
6
PLOS ONE
based on 1737 papers
Top 71%
4.7%
7
The American Journal of Human Genetics
based on 77 papers
Top 3%
4.7%
8
Human Genomics
based on 13 papers
Top 0.1%
3.1%
50% of probability mass above
9
Frontiers in Genetics
based on 32 papers
Top 0.9%
2.9%
10
Briefings in Bioinformatics
based on 11 papers
Top 0.2%
2.4%
11
Human Genetics and Genomics Advances
based on 39 papers
Top 0.7%
2.4%
12
Genetics in Medicine
based on 57 papers
Top 3%
2.4%
13
European Journal of Human Genetics
based on 25 papers
Top 1%
1.8%
14
Cell Genomics
based on 34 papers
Top 2%
1.6%
15
Bioinformatics
based on 24 papers
Top 0.8%
1.6%
16
Communications Biology
based on 36 papers
Top 1%
1.6%
17
eLife
based on 262 papers
Top 20%
1.4%
18
Nature
based on 58 papers
Top 6%
1.4%
19
npj Genomic Medicine
based on 18 papers
Top 2%
1.2%
20
Human Genetics
based on 14 papers
Top 0.9%
1.2%
21
Human Molecular Genetics
based on 28 papers
Top 4%
0.9%
22
Nature Human Behaviour
based on 18 papers
Top 2%
0.8%
23
Genes
based on 21 papers
Top 2%
0.7%
24
Aging
based on 18 papers
Top 5%
0.7%
25
Translational Psychiatry
based on 94 papers
Top 8%
0.7%
26
BMC Genomics
based on 15 papers
Top 0.8%
0.7%
27
Journal of Clinical Medicine
based on 77 papers
Top 17%
0.7%
28
Circulation: Genomic and Precision Medicine
based on 30 papers
Top 5%
0.7%