Back

Analysis of associations between polygenic risk score and COVID-19 severity in a Russian population using low-pass genome sequencing

Nostaeva, A.; Shimansky, V.; Apalko, S.; Kuznetsov, I.; Sushentseva, N.; Popov, O.; Anisenkova, A.; Mosenko, S.; Karssen, L.; Aulchenko, Y.; Shcherbak, S.

2023-12-08 genetic and genomic medicine
10.1101/2023.11.20.23298335 medRxiv
Show abstract

The course of COVID-19 is characterized by wide variability, with genetics playing a contributing role. Through large-scale genetic association studies, a significant link between genetic variants and disease severity was established. However, individual genetic variants identified thus far have shown modest effects, indicating a polygenic nature of this trait. To address this, a polygenic risk score (PRS) can be employed to aggregate the effects of multiple single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) into a single number, allowing practical application to individuals within a population. In this work, we investigated the performance of a PRS model in the context of COVID-19 severity in 1,085 Russian participants using low-coverage NGS sequencing. By developing a genome-wide PRS model based on summary statistics from the COVID-19 Host Genetics Initiative consortium, we demonstrated that the PRS, which incorporates information from over a million common genetic variants, can effectively identify individuals at significantly higher risk for severe COVID-19. The findings revealed that individuals in the top 10% of the PRS distribution had a markedly elevated risk of severe COVID-19, with an odds ratio (OR) of 2.1 (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.4-3.2, p-value = 0.00046). Furthermore, incorporating the PRS into the prediction model significantly improved its accuracy compared to a model that solely relied on demographic information (p-value < 0.0001). This study highlights the potential of PRS as a valuable tool for identifying individuals at increased risk of severe COVID-19 based on their genetic profile.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.