Visual cortex anodal tDCS does not alter reading performance for Chinese presented character-by-character to normal peripheral vision
Lyu, A.; Silva, A. E.; Thompson, B.; Abel, L.; Cheong, A. M. Y.
Show abstract
Visual cortex transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) reduces crowding in normal peripheral vision and may improve reading of English words in patients with macular degeneration. Given the different visual requirements of reading English words and Chinese characters, the effect of tDCS on peripheral reading performance in English might be different from Chinese. This study recruited seventeen participants (59 to 73 years of age) with normal vision and tested the hypothesis that anodal tDCS would improve reading of Chinese characters presented at 10{degrees} eccentricity compared with sham stimulation. Chinese sentences of different print sizes and exposure durations were presented one character at a time 10{degrees} below or to the left of fixation, and the individual critical print size (CPS) - the smallest print size eliciting the maximum reading speed (MRS) was determined. Reading accuracies for characters presented 0.2 logMAR smaller than the CPS were measured before, during, 5 mins, and 30 mins after receiving active or sham anodal visual cortex tDCS. Participants completed both the active and sham sessions in a random order following a double-blind, within-subject design. No effect of active anodal-tDCS on reading accuracy was observed, implying that a single session of tDCS did not improve Chinese character reading in normal peripheral vision. This may suggest that tDCS does not significantly reduce the crowding elicited within a single Chinese character. However, the effect of tDCS on between-character crowding is yet to be determined.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Automatic Measurements of Smooth Pursuit Eye Movements by Video-Oculography and Deep Learning-Based Object Detection 93%
- Retinal implantation of electronic vision prostheses to treat retinitis pigmentosa: A systematic review 92%
- Visual field evaluation using Zippy Adaptive Threshold Algorithm (ZATA) Standard and ZATA Fast in patients with glaucoma and healthy individuals 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- What do blind people "see" with retinal prostheses? Observations and qualitative reports of epiretinal implant users 93%
- Anodal M1 tDCS enhances online learning of rhythmic timing videogame skill 93%
- Salzburg Visual Field Trainer (SVFT): A virtual reality device for (the evaluation of) neuropsychological rehabilitation 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- A comparison of therapies using Eyetronix Flicker Glass and standard adhesive patches in children with anisometropic amblyopia: A randomized controlled trial 93%
- Adaptation of visual responses in degenerating rd10 and healthy mouse retinas during ongoing electrical stimulation. 93%
- High Gamma and Beta Temporal Interference Stimulation in the Human Motor Cortex Improves Motor Functions 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation to the Secondary Visual Cortex at 80% Active Motor Threshold Does Not Impair Central Vision in Humans During a Simple Detection Task 92%
- Brain Functional Connectivity Correlates of Anomalous Interaction Between Sensorily Isolated Monozygotic Twins 91%
- Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Measures of Corticospinal Excitability in Black and Hispanic/Latino People with Painful Peripheral Neuropathy 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.