Back

Feature analysis of joint motion while reaching the occiput in patients with mild hemiplegia: a cross-sectional study

Sakamoto, D.; Hamaguchi, T.; Kanemura, N.; Yasojima, T.; Kubota, K.; Suwabe, R.; Nakayama, Y.; Abo, M.

2023-11-16 rehabilitation medicine and physical therapy
10.1101/2023.11.15.23298611 medRxiv
Show abstract

This cross-sectional study aimed to clarify the kinematic characteristics of reaching the occiput in patients with mild hemiplegia. Ten patients with post-stroke hemiplegia who attended the Department of Rehabilitation Medicine of the Jikei University Hospital and met the eligibility criteria were included. Reaching motion to the back of the head by the participants paralyzed and non-paralyzed upper limbs was measured using three-dimensional motion analysis, and the motor time, joint angles, and angular velocity were calculated. Multivariate analysis of covariance was performed on these data. After confirming the fit to the binomial logistic regression model, the cutoff values were calculated using the receiver operating characteristic curve. The cutoff values for the movement until the hand reached the back of the head were 1.6 s for the motor time, 55{degrees} for the maximum shoulder joint flexion angle, and 145{degrees} for the maximum elbow joint flexion angle. The cutoff values for the movement from the back of the head to the hand being returned to its original position were 1.6 s for the motor time, 145{degrees} for the maximum elbow joint flexion angle, 53{degrees}/s for the maximum angular velocity of shoulder joint abduction, and 62{degrees}/s for the maximum angular velocity of elbow joint flexion. The numbers of clusters were three, four, and four for the outward non-paralyzed side, outward and return paralyzed side, and return non-paralyzed side, respectively. The findings obtained by this study can be used for practice planning in patients with mild hemiplegia who aim to improve the reaching motion to the occiput.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.