Back

Identification of neural and non-neural origins of joint hyper-resistance based on a novel neuromechanical model.

Willaert, J.; Desloovere, K.; Van Campenhout, A.; Ting, L. H.; De Groote, F.

2023-11-13 pathology
10.1101/2023.11.09.566428 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Joint hyper-resistance is a common symptom in neurological disorders. It has both neural and nonneural origins, but it has been challenging to distinguish different origins based on clinical tests alone. Combining instrumented tests with parameter identification based on a neuromechanical model may allow us to dissociate the different origins of joint hyper-resistance in individual patients. However, this requires that the model captures the underlying mechanisms. Here, we propose a neuromechanical model that, in contrast to previously proposed models, accounts for muscle shortrange stiffness and its interaction with muscle tone and reflex activity. We collected knee angle trajectories during the pendulum test in 15 children with cerebral palsy (CP) and 5 typically developing children. We did the test in two conditions - hold and pre-movement - that have been shown to alter knee movement. We modeled the lower leg as an inverted pendulum actuated by two antagonistic Hill-type muscles extended with SRS. Reflex activity was modeled as delayed, linear feedback from muscle force. We estimated neural and non-neural parameters by optimizing the fit between simulated and measured knee angle trajectories during the hold condition. The model could fit a wide range of knee angle trajectories in the hold condition. The model with personalized parameters predicted the effect of pre-movement demonstrating that the model captured the underlying mechanism and subject-specific deficits. Our model thus allows us to determine subject-specific origins of joint hyper-resistance and thereby opens perspectives for improved diagnosis and consequently treatment selection in children with spastic CP.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 4%
12.4%
2
Skeletal Muscle
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.4%
3
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 3%
10.1%
4
Journal of Biomechanics
57 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.2%
5
The Journal of Physiology
134 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.4%
6
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 28%
6.3%
50% of probability mass above
7
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 17%
4.9%
8
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 6%
3.1%
9
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 42%
3.1%
10
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.9%
11
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.6%
12
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
13
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 29%
1.9%
14
The Journal of Neuroscience
928 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.9%
15
IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics
34 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
16
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
17
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 24%
1.1%
18
Heliyon
146 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
19
Neuroscience
88 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
20
IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering
40 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
21
Journal of Neurophysiology
263 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%