Back

Genetic QT Score and Sleep Apnea as Predictors of Sudden Cardiac Death in the UK Biobank

Arora, A.; Zareba, W.; Woosley, R. L.; Klimentidis, Y. C.; Patel, I. Y.; Quan, S. F.; Wendel, C.; Shamoun, F.; Guerra, S.; Parthasarathy, S.; Patel, S. I.

2023-11-08 cardiovascular medicine
10.1101/2023.11.07.23298237 medRxiv
Show abstract

IntroductionThe goal of this study was to evaluate the association between a polygenic risk score (PRS) for QT prolongation (QTc-PRS), QTc intervals and mortality in patients enrolled in the UK Biobank with and without sleep apnea. MethodsThe QTc-PRS was calculated using allele copy number and previously reported effect estimates for each single nuclear polymorphism SNP. Competing-risk regression models adjusting for age, sex, BMI, QT prolonging medication, race, and comorbid cardiovascular conditions were used for sudden cardiac death (SCD) analyses. Results500,584 participants were evaluated (56.5 {+/-}8 years, 54% women, 1.4% diagnosed with sleep apnea). A higher QTc-PRS was independently associated with the increased QTc interval duration (p<0.0001). The mean QTc for the top QTc-PRS quintile was 15 msec longer than the bottom quintile (p<0.001). Sleep apnea was found to be an effect modifier in the relationship between QTc-PRS and SCD. The adjusted HR per 5-unit change in QTc-PRS for SCD was 1.64 (95% CI 1.16 - 2.31, p=0.005) among those with sleep apnea and 1.04 (95% CI 0.95 - 1.14, p=0.44) among those without sleep apnea (p for interaction =0.01). Black participants with sleep apnea had significantly elevated adjusted risk of SCD compared to White participants (HR=9.6, 95% CI 1.24 - 74, p=0.03). ConclusionIn the UK Biobank population, the QTc-PRS was associated with SCD among participants with sleep apnea but not among those without sleep apnea, indicating that sleep apnea is a significant modifier of the genetic risk. Black participants with sleep apnea had a particularly high risk of SCD.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.