Real-world effectiveness of non-pharmaceutical interventions in containing COVID-19 pandemic after the roll-out of coronavirus vaccines: A systematic review
Xiaona, H.; Chen, H.; Zhu, X.; Gao, W.
Show abstract
BackgroundNon-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) have been widely used to control the transmission of infectious diseases. However, the current research evidence on the policy mechanisms of NPIs is still limited. This study aims to systematically identify, describe, and evaluate the existing literature for the real-world effectiveness of NPIs in containing COVID-19 pandemic after the roll-out of coronavirus vaccines, in order to search for optimal strategies for implementing NPIs. MethodsWe conducted a comprehensive search of relevant studies from January 1, 2021, to June 4, 2023 in PubMed, Embase, Web of science and MedRxiv. Two authors independently assessed eligibility and extracted data. Risk of bias assessment tool was used to evaluate the study design, statistical methodology, and quality of reporting. Data were collected, synthesised and analyzed through quantitative and qualitative approaches. The findings were presented using summary tables and figures, including information on the target countries and regions of the study, types of NPIs, and evidence quality. ResultsThe review included a total of seventeen studies that examined the real-world effectiveness of NPIs in containing the COVID-19 pandemic after the vaccine roll-out. These studies used five composite indicator that combined multiple NPIs and fourteen individual NPIs. The studies had an average quality assessment score of 13 (range: 10-16), indicating moderately high quality. Among the included studies, nine assessed the effectiveness of the composite indicator, with four of them also evaluating individual NPIs. Additionally, twelve studies investigated the effectiveness of individual NPIs. The most frequently evaluated individual NPIs were testing policy, restrictions on gathering, facial covering, and school closure. Workplace closures and stay-at-home requirements were also assessed. The effectiveness of NPIs varied depending on time frames, countries and regions. ConclusionIn summary, the research evidence suggests that NPIs remain effective in curbing the spread of COVID-19 even after the roll-out of vaccines. Studies based on different contexts had different viewpoints or conclusions regarding the effectiveness of NPIs in containing the COVID-19 pandemic. Further research is needed to understand the policy mechanisms and address potential future challenges.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy worldwide: a systematic review of vaccine acceptance rates 96%
- The Societal Value of Vaccines: Expert-Based Conceptual Framework and Methods Using COVID-19 Vaccines as A Case Study 95%
- Effectiveness of vaccination against symptomatic and asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Modelling the impact of behavioural interventions during pandemics: A systematic review 96%
- COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy among Marginalized Populations in the U.S. and Canada: Protocol for a Scoping Review 95%
- Implementation strategies to increase human papillomavirus vaccination uptake for adolescent girls in sub-Saharan Africa: A scoping review protocol 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- The connection between COVID-19 vaccine abundance, vaccination coverage, and public trust in government across the globe 96%
- Parental attitudes towards mandatory vaccination; a systematic review 95%
- Public opinion on global distribution of COVID-19 vaccines: evidence from two nationally representative surveys in Germany and the United States 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Determinants of SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine Engagement in Algeria: A Population-based Study with Systematic Review of Studies from Arab Countries of the MENA Region 96%
- Effectiveness of COVID-19 Vaccines and Post-vaccination SARS-COV 2 Infection, Hospitalization, and Mortality: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Observational Studies 95%
- Health Belief, Planned Behavior, or Psychological Antecedents: What predicts COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy better among the Bangladeshi Adults? 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Phased implementation of COVID-19 vaccination: rapid assessment of policy adoption, reach and effectiveness to protect the most vulnerable in the US 92%
- A rapid review of COVID-19 vaccine prioritization in the U.S.: alignment between Federal guidance and State practice 92%
- Factors Associated with Intention to Vaccinate against COVID-19 in Puerto Rico 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.