Back

Lower Physical Activity Modifies the Association between Perceived Fatigability and Executive Function but not Memory: The Study of Muscle, Mobility and Aging (SOMMA)

Schumacher, B. T.; Rosano, C.; Qiao, Y.; Rosso, A. L.; Cawthon, P. M.; Moored, K. D.; Cummings, S. R.; Kritchevsky, S. B.; Glynn, N. W.

2023-11-07 epidemiology
10.1101/2023.11.06.23298173 medRxiv
Show abstract

OBJECTIVEEmerging evidence shows that perceived fatigability--the quantification of vulnerability to fatigue in relation to specific intensity and duration of activities--may be associated with cognitive function. We sought to quantify associations with multiple domains of cognitive function and the role of physical activity (PA). METHODSSOMMA participants completed the Pittsburgh Fatigability Scale (PFS) Physical and Mental subscales (each range 0-50; higher scores=greater fatigability) and three cognitive function assessments [Digit Symbol Substitution Test (DSST), executive function; Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), general function; and California Verbal Learning Test (CVLT), memory]. Linear regression quantified associations cross-sectionally between each PFS subscale and cognitive assessment scores adjusting for covariates. Effect modification by volume and intensity of accelerometer-measured PA was assessed. RESULTSIn 873 participants (59.2% women; age 76.3{+/-}5.0; 85% White), mean PFS Physical, Mental, and DSST scores were 15.8{+/-}8.7, 7.7{+/-}7.8, and 55.4{+/-}13.7. After adjustments, for each 4-point higher PFS Physical and 3-point higher PFS Mental, participants had nearly one fewer correct DSST items [{beta} coefficient and 95% confidence interval for PFS Physical: -0.69 (-1.09, - 0.29); PFS Mental: -0.64 (-0.97, -0.30)]. Volume and intensity of PA modified the association of PFS Mental and DSST (Pinteractions<0.01). All associations were strongest in those with the lowest volume and intensity of PA. PFS was not associated with MoCA or CVLT. DISCUSSIONGreater perceived fatigability may be associated with poorer executive function, but not memory. Individuals with greater perceived fatigability, particularly those less active, might benefit from interventions that reduce fatigability and may beneficially influence cognitive function.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
The Journals of Gerontology: Series A
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
28.4%
2
The Journals of Gerontology, Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
19.1%
3
GeroScience
97 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.7%
50% of probability mass above
4
Experimental Gerontology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.1%
5
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 38%
3.7%
6
European Journal of Epidemiology
40 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.7%
7
Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle
27 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.7%
8
Aging
69 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.2%
9
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.0%
10
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 49%
2.1%
11
Aging Cell
144 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
12
Clinical Epigenetics
53 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.3%
13
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.8%
14
Frontiers in Aging
10 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
15
Current Developments in Nutrition
15 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.7%
16
BMC Geriatrics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
17
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.7%
18
SSM - Population Health
17 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
19
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
15 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
20
American Journal of Epidemiology
57 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
21
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%