Back

The Host-specific Microbiota is Required for Diet-Specific Metabolic Homeostasis

Fei, N.; Xie, B.; Long, T. J.; StGeorge, M.; Tan, A.; Manzoor, S.; Sidebottom, A. M.; Melanie Spedale, M.; Betty R Theriault, B. R.; Dinanath Sulakhe, D. S.; B., E. B.

2023-11-06 microbiology
10.1101/2023.11.05.565654 bioRxiv
Show abstract

In complex mammals, the importance and host-specificity of microbial communities have been demonstrated through their positive effects on host immune fitness or performance. However, whether host metabolic physiology homeostasis depends on a specific bacterial community exclusive to the host remains unclear. Here, we show that the coevolved host-specific microbiota is required to maintain diet-specific flexible and sufficient metabolic homeostasis through a high colonization rate, modulating gut metabolites, and related targets. Using germ-free (GF) mice, we tested whether the fitness benefiting the host metabolic phenotype of microbiota was host-specific. We demonstrated that GF mice associated with exogenous microbiota (human microbiota (HM)), which exhibited different and reduced gut microbial species diversity, significantly elevated metabolic rate, and exhibited metabolic insufficiency, all characteristics of GF mice. Strikingly, the absence of the host-specific microbiome attenuated high-fat diet-specific metabolism features. Different diets caused different metabolic changes in only host-specific microbiota-associated mice, not the host-microbiota mismatched mice. While RNA sequencing revealed subtle changes in the expression of genes in the liver, GF mice and HM mice showed considerably altered expression of genes associated with metabolic physiology compared to GF mice associated with host-specific microbiota. The effect of diet outweighed microbiota in the liver transcriptome. These changes occurred in the setting of decreased luminal short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) and the secondary bile acid (BAs) pool and downstream gut signaling targets in HM and GF mice, which affects whole-body metabolism. These data indicate that a foreign microbial community provides little metabolic benefit to the host when compared to a host-specific microbiome, due to the colonization selection pressure and microbiota-derived metabolites dysfunction. Overall, microbiome fitness effects on the host metabolic phenotype were host-specific. Understanding the impact of the host-specificity of the microbiome on metabolic homeostasis may provide important insights for building a better probiotic. HighlightsO_LIMicrobiome fitness effects on the host metabolic phenotype were host-specific in mammals. C_LIO_LIHuman microbiota-associated mice exhibited lower host metabolic fitness or performance, and similar functional costs in GF mice. C_LIO_LIDifferent diets cause different metabolic changes only in host-specific microbiota-associated mice, not the host-microbiota mismatched mice. C_LIO_LIThe defective gut microbiota in host-specific microbiota, microbial metabolites and related targets likely drive the metabolic homeostasis. C_LI Graphical Abstract O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=132 SRC="FIGDIR/small/565654v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (41K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@16a864org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1894996org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@3e5429org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@77bfb_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.